-
Original Article08-14-2024
Clinical trajectories of critically ill patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility: retrospective cohort
- João Gabriel Rosa Ramos
, - Milton José de Souza Neto ,
- Alef Santiago Rezende,
- Flavia dos Santos Ferreira,
- Yanne Danielly Santos Amorim, [ ... ],
- Lucas Freire de Andrade
Abstract
Original ArticleClinical trajectories of critically ill patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility: retrospective cohort
Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240015en
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20240015-en
- João Gabriel Rosa Ramos ,
- Milton José de Souza Neto ,
- Alef Santiago Rezende,
- Flavia dos Santos Ferreira,
- Yanne Danielly Santos Amorim,
- Flaviane Ribeiro de Souza ,
- Lucas Freire de Andrade
Views156ABSTRACT
Objective:
To describe the clinical trajectories of patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were transferred from an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit to a postacute care facility between July 2017 and April 2023. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure score.
Results:
A total of 847 patients were included in the study, and the mean age was 71 years. A total of 692 (82%) patients were admitted for rehabilitation, while 155 (18%) were admitted for palliative care. The mean length of stay in the postacute care facility was 36 days; 389 (45.9%) patients were discharged home, 173 (20.4%) were transferred to an acute hospital, and 285 (33.6%) died during hospitalization, of whom 263 (92%) had a do-not-resuscitate order. Of the patients admitted for rehabilitation purposes, 61 (9.4%) had a worsened functional status, 179 (27.6%) had no change in functional status, and 469 (63%) had an improved functional status during hospitalization. Moreover, 234 (33.8%) patients modified their care goals to palliative care, most of whom were in the group that did not improve functional status. Patients whose functional status improved during hospitalization were younger, had fewer comorbidities, had fewer previous hospitalizations, had lower rates of enteral feeding and tracheostomy, had higher Functional Independence Measure scores at admission to the postacute care facility and were more likely to be discharged home with less complex health care assistance.
Conclusion:
Postacute care facilities may play a role in the care of patients after discharge from intensive care units, both for those receiving rehabilitation and palliative care, especially for those with more severe illnesses who may not be discharged directly home.
Keywords:AgedDelivery of health careFunctional statusHospitalizationintensive care unitsLength of stayPalliative CarePatient dischargeSubacute careSee moreViews156
Abstract
Original ArticleClinical trajectories of critically ill patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility: retrospective cohort
Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240015en
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20240015-en
- João Gabriel Rosa Ramos ,
- Milton José de Souza Neto ,
- Alef Santiago Rezende,
- Flavia dos Santos Ferreira,
- Yanne Danielly Santos Amorim,
- Flaviane Ribeiro de Souza ,
- Lucas Freire de Andrade
Views156ABSTRACT
Objective:
To describe the clinical trajectories of patients discharged directly from a critical unit to a postacute care facility.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were transferred from an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit to a postacute care facility between July 2017 and April 2023. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure score.
Results:
A total of 847 patients were included in the study, and the mean age was 71 years. A total of 692 (82%) patients were admitted for rehabilitation, while 155 (18%) were admitted for palliative care. The mean length of stay in the postacute care facility was 36 days; 389 (45.9%) patients were discharged home, 173 (20.4%) were transferred to an acute hospital, and 285 (33.6%) died during hospitalization, of whom 263 (92%) had a do-not-resuscitate order. Of the patients admitted for rehabilitation purposes, 61 (9.4%) had a worsened functional status, 179 (27.6%) had no change in functional status, and 469 (63%) had an improved functional status during hospitalization. Moreover, 234 (33.8%) patients modified their care goals to palliative care, most of whom were in the group that did not improve functional status. Patients whose functional status improved during hospitalization were younger, had fewer comorbidities, had fewer previous hospitalizations, had lower rates of enteral feeding and tracheostomy, had higher Functional Independence Measure scores at admission to the postacute care facility and were more likely to be discharged home with less complex health care assistance.
Conclusion:
Postacute care facilities may play a role in the care of patients after discharge from intensive care units, both for those receiving rehabilitation and palliative care, especially for those with more severe illnesses who may not be discharged directly home.
Keywords:AgedDelivery of health careFunctional statusHospitalizationintensive care unitsLength of stayPalliative CarePatient dischargeSubacute careSee more
- João Gabriel Rosa Ramos
-
Original Article03-14-2019
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33
Abstract
Original ArticleThe Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20190006
Views306ABSTRACT
Objective:
Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit.
Methods:
Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot.
Results:
The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99).
Conclusion:
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings.
Keywords:Accidental falls/prevention & controlAgedHospitalizationintensive care unitsPatient dischargePhysical therapy modalitiesRehabilitationRisk assessmentSee moreViews306Abstract
Original ArticleThe Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20190006
Views306ABSTRACT
Objective:
Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit.
Methods:
Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot.
Results:
The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99).
Conclusion:
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings.
Keywords:Accidental falls/prevention & controlAgedHospitalizationintensive care unitsPatient dischargePhysical therapy modalitiesRehabilitationRisk assessmentSee more
-
Original Article01-01-2017
Functional ability in younger and older elderlies after discharge from the intensive care unit. A prospective cohort
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2017;29(3):293-302
Abstract
Original ArticleFunctional ability in younger and older elderlies after discharge from the intensive care unit. A prospective cohort
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2017;29(3):293-302
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170055
Views53See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
To compare the functional capacity of younger elderly individuals (60 to 79 years old) with that of older elderly individuals (≥ 80 years old) during the first 6 months after discharge from the intensive care unit.
Methods:
A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted, in which data on intensive care unit admission and outcomes after hospital discharge (immediate post-discharge, after 3 months and after 6 months) were collected. Muscle strength was evaluated through the protocol of the Medical Research Council and dynamometry (handgrip); the ability to perform activities of daily life and functional independence were assessed by the Barthel index and the usual level of physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); and quality of life was assessed by the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2.
Results:
Among the 253 patients included, 167 were younger elderly (between 61 and 79 years old), and 86 were older elderly (≥ 80 years old). During the sixth month of evaluation, the older elderlies presented a higher need for a caregiver (69.0% versus 49, 5%, p = 0.002). Functional capacity prior to intensive care unit admission and in the third month after discharge was lower in older elderlies than in younger ones (Barthel prior to the intensive care unit: 73.0 ± 30.0 versus 86.5 ± 22.6; p <0.001, Barthel in the third month: 63.5 ± 34.0 versus 71.5 ± 35.5, p = 0.03), as was the usual level of physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire in the third month: active/very active 3.4% versus 18.3%, no physical activity 64.4% versus 39.7%, p < 0.001, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire in the sixth month: active/very active 5.8% versus 20.8%, no physical activity 69.2% versus 43.4%, p = 0.005). Older elderlies had lower muscle strength when assessed according to handgrip in both the dominant (14.5 ± 7.7 versus 19.9 ± 9.6, p = 0.008) and non-dominant limb (13.1 ± 6.7 versus 17.5 ± 9.1, p = 0.02). There were no differences in functional capacity loss or reported quality of life between the age groups.
Conclusion:
Although there were great functional capacity losses after discharge from the intensive care unit in both age groups, there was no difference in the magnitude of functional capacity loss between younger (60 to 79 years) and older elderly individuals (≥ 80 years old) during the first 6 months after discharge from the intensive care unit.
Views53Abstract
Original ArticleFunctional ability in younger and older elderlies after discharge from the intensive care unit. A prospective cohort
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2017;29(3):293-302
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170055
Views53See moreABSTRACT
Objective:
To compare the functional capacity of younger elderly individuals (60 to 79 years old) with that of older elderly individuals (≥ 80 years old) during the first 6 months after discharge from the intensive care unit.
Methods:
A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted, in which data on intensive care unit admission and outcomes after hospital discharge (immediate post-discharge, after 3 months and after 6 months) were collected. Muscle strength was evaluated through the protocol of the Medical Research Council and dynamometry (handgrip); the ability to perform activities of daily life and functional independence were assessed by the Barthel index and the usual level of physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); and quality of life was assessed by the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2.
Results:
Among the 253 patients included, 167 were younger elderly (between 61 and 79 years old), and 86 were older elderly (≥ 80 years old). During the sixth month of evaluation, the older elderlies presented a higher need for a caregiver (69.0% versus 49, 5%, p = 0.002). Functional capacity prior to intensive care unit admission and in the third month after discharge was lower in older elderlies than in younger ones (Barthel prior to the intensive care unit: 73.0 ± 30.0 versus 86.5 ± 22.6; p <0.001, Barthel in the third month: 63.5 ± 34.0 versus 71.5 ± 35.5, p = 0.03), as was the usual level of physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire in the third month: active/very active 3.4% versus 18.3%, no physical activity 64.4% versus 39.7%, p < 0.001, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire in the sixth month: active/very active 5.8% versus 20.8%, no physical activity 69.2% versus 43.4%, p = 0.005). Older elderlies had lower muscle strength when assessed according to handgrip in both the dominant (14.5 ± 7.7 versus 19.9 ± 9.6, p = 0.008) and non-dominant limb (13.1 ± 6.7 versus 17.5 ± 9.1, p = 0.02). There were no differences in functional capacity loss or reported quality of life between the age groups.
Conclusion:
Although there were great functional capacity losses after discharge from the intensive care unit in both age groups, there was no difference in the magnitude of functional capacity loss between younger (60 to 79 years) and older elderly individuals (≥ 80 years old) during the first 6 months after discharge from the intensive care unit.
-
Original Article01-01-2015
Prognostic value of ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2015;27(4):333-339
Abstract
Original ArticlePrognostic value of ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2015;27(4):333-339
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20150057
Views104See moreABSTRACT
Objectives:
To evaluate the prevalence of myocardial dysfunction and its prognostic value in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Methods:
Adult septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively studied using transthoracic echocardiography within the first 48 hours after admission and thereafter on the 7th-10th days. Echocardiographic variables of biventricular function, including the E/e' ratio, were compared between survivors and non-survivors.
Results:
A total of 99 echocardiograms (53 at admission and 46 between days 7 - 10) were performed on 53 patients with a mean age of 74 (SD 13) years. Systolic and diastolic dysfunction was present in 14 (26%) and 42 (83%) patients, respectively, and both types of dysfunction were present in 12 (23%) patients. The E/e' ratio, an index of diastolic dysfunction, was the best predictor of hospital mortality according to the area under the ROC curve (0.71) and was an independent predictor of outcome, as determined by multivariate analysis (OR = 1.36 [1.05 - 1.76], p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit, echocardiographic systolic dysfunction is not associated with increased mortality. In contrast, diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of outcome.
Views104Abstract
Original ArticlePrognostic value of ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2015;27(4):333-339
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20150057
Views104See moreABSTRACT
Objectives:
To evaluate the prevalence of myocardial dysfunction and its prognostic value in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Methods:
Adult septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively studied using transthoracic echocardiography within the first 48 hours after admission and thereafter on the 7th-10th days. Echocardiographic variables of biventricular function, including the E/e' ratio, were compared between survivors and non-survivors.
Results:
A total of 99 echocardiograms (53 at admission and 46 between days 7 - 10) were performed on 53 patients with a mean age of 74 (SD 13) years. Systolic and diastolic dysfunction was present in 14 (26%) and 42 (83%) patients, respectively, and both types of dysfunction were present in 12 (23%) patients. The E/e' ratio, an index of diastolic dysfunction, was the best predictor of hospital mortality according to the area under the ROC curve (0.71) and was an independent predictor of outcome, as determined by multivariate analysis (OR = 1.36 [1.05 - 1.76], p = 0.02).
Conclusion:
In septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit, echocardiographic systolic dysfunction is not associated with increased mortality. In contrast, diastolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of outcome.
-
Review Article08-01-2012
Palliative care of elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2012;24(2):197-206
Abstract
Review ArticlePalliative care of elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2012;24(2):197-206
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2012000200017
Views46See moreOBJECTIVE: The use of interventionist medical technology in terminal elderly patients must be associated with palliative care as a measure of clinical support in intensive care units. Palliative care is an important component of end-of-life care, and the assistance provided by the healthcare team should be guided by decisions made by patients and their family members. Prolongation of life not accompanied by therapies aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain and dyspnea, contributes to patient and family member stress suffering. The aim of the present study was to survey advances made in the application of palliative care in intensive care units. METHODS: Medline and Bireme were used to perform a systematic literature review of intensive care units-based palliative care for elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 29 articles describing palliative care in intensive care units were analyzed according to the variables "satisfaction of relatives when they participate in the discussions on palliative care" and "difficulties to implement such type of care due to lack of technical skills of the health caregivers." CONCLUSION: Palliative care for elderly patients in intensive care units must be more thoroughly investigated to improve the relationships and communication among patients, their relatives, and the healthcare team. As greater numbers of elderly patients are admitted to intensive care units, the skills of health caregivers must improve to meet the challenges posed by the end-of-life care.
Views46Abstract
Review ArticlePalliative care of elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2012;24(2):197-206
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2012000200017
Views46See moreOBJECTIVE: The use of interventionist medical technology in terminal elderly patients must be associated with palliative care as a measure of clinical support in intensive care units. Palliative care is an important component of end-of-life care, and the assistance provided by the healthcare team should be guided by decisions made by patients and their family members. Prolongation of life not accompanied by therapies aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain and dyspnea, contributes to patient and family member stress suffering. The aim of the present study was to survey advances made in the application of palliative care in intensive care units. METHODS: Medline and Bireme were used to perform a systematic literature review of intensive care units-based palliative care for elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 29 articles describing palliative care in intensive care units were analyzed according to the variables "satisfaction of relatives when they participate in the discussions on palliative care" and "difficulties to implement such type of care due to lack of technical skills of the health caregivers." CONCLUSION: Palliative care for elderly patients in intensive care units must be more thoroughly investigated to improve the relationships and communication among patients, their relatives, and the healthcare team. As greater numbers of elderly patients are admitted to intensive care units, the skills of health caregivers must improve to meet the challenges posed by the end-of-life care.
-
Original Article07-26-2010
Risk factors for death among critically ill elderly patients
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2010;22(2):138-143
Abstract
Original ArticleRisk factors for death among critically ill elderly patients
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2010;22(2):138-143
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2010000200007
Views59See moreBACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing all over the world. The need of intensive care by the elderly is also increasing. There is a lack of studies investigating the risk factors for death among critically ill elderly patients. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with death in a population of critically ill elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Brazil. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all elderly patients (>60 years) admitted to an intensive care unit in Fortaleza, Brazil, from January to December 2007. A comparison between survivors and nonsurvivors was done and the risk factors for death were investigated through univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included, with an average age of 73 ± 7.6 years; 59% were female. Mortality was 62.8%. The main cause of death was multiple organ dysfunction (42.3%), followed by septic shock (36.5%) and cardiogenic shock (9.7%). Complications during intensive care unit ICU stay associated with death were respiratory failure (OR=61, p<0.001), acute kidney injury (OR=23, p<0.001), sepsis (OR=12, p<0.001), metabolic acidosis (OR=17, p<0.001), anemia (OR=8.6, p<0.005), coagulation disturbance (OR=5.9, p<0.001) and atrial fibrillation (OR=4.8, p<0.041). Independent risk factors for death were age (OR=1.15, p<0.005), coma (OR=7.51, p<0.003), hypotension (OR=21.75, p=0.003), respiratory failure (OR=9.93, p<0.0001) and acute kidney injury (OR=16.28, p<0.014). CONCLUSION: Mortality is high among critically ill elderly patients. Factors associated with death were age, coma, hypotension, respiratory failure and acute kidney injury.
Views59Abstract
Original ArticleRisk factors for death among critically ill elderly patients
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2010;22(2):138-143
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2010000200007
Views59See moreBACKGROUND: The elderly population is increasing all over the world. The need of intensive care by the elderly is also increasing. There is a lack of studies investigating the risk factors for death among critically ill elderly patients. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with death in a population of critically ill elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Brazil. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all elderly patients (>60 years) admitted to an intensive care unit in Fortaleza, Brazil, from January to December 2007. A comparison between survivors and nonsurvivors was done and the risk factors for death were investigated through univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included, with an average age of 73 ± 7.6 years; 59% were female. Mortality was 62.8%. The main cause of death was multiple organ dysfunction (42.3%), followed by septic shock (36.5%) and cardiogenic shock (9.7%). Complications during intensive care unit ICU stay associated with death were respiratory failure (OR=61, p<0.001), acute kidney injury (OR=23, p<0.001), sepsis (OR=12, p<0.001), metabolic acidosis (OR=17, p<0.001), anemia (OR=8.6, p<0.005), coagulation disturbance (OR=5.9, p<0.001) and atrial fibrillation (OR=4.8, p<0.041). Independent risk factors for death were age (OR=1.15, p<0.005), coma (OR=7.51, p<0.003), hypotension (OR=21.75, p=0.003), respiratory failure (OR=9.93, p<0.0001) and acute kidney injury (OR=16.28, p<0.014). CONCLUSION: Mortality is high among critically ill elderly patients. Factors associated with death were age, coma, hypotension, respiratory failure and acute kidney injury.
-
Review Article02-25-2009
The morality of allocating resources to the elderly care in intensive care unit
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(4):432-436
Abstract
Review ArticleThe morality of allocating resources to the elderly care in intensive care unit
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(4):432-436
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000400014
Views51See moreThe world is aging. In Brazil, and in several other countries in the world, changes in population's age composition have been accompanied by an increase in demand for types of health care whose cost is high. Actually, some moral conflicts are arising from allocation of public resources for health, because the magnitude of social inequalities in health and limited resources require that priorities for public management are based on knowledge of the health situation and the impact of policies, programs, projects and actions on health. In this context, the intensive medicine, managers and physicians in intensive care are subject to moral conflicts, especially at the fair micro allocation resources for the elderly in the intensive care unit level. This paper attempts to review the situation of conflicts in the light of the tools of bioethics.
Views51Abstract
Review ArticleThe morality of allocating resources to the elderly care in intensive care unit
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(4):432-436
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000400014
Views51See moreThe world is aging. In Brazil, and in several other countries in the world, changes in population's age composition have been accompanied by an increase in demand for types of health care whose cost is high. Actually, some moral conflicts are arising from allocation of public resources for health, because the magnitude of social inequalities in health and limited resources require that priorities for public management are based on knowledge of the health situation and the impact of policies, programs, projects and actions on health. In this context, the intensive medicine, managers and physicians in intensive care are subject to moral conflicts, especially at the fair micro allocation resources for the elderly in the intensive care unit level. This paper attempts to review the situation of conflicts in the light of the tools of bioethics.
-
Original Article10-30-2009
Aged patients with respiratory dysfunction: epidemiological profile and mortality risk factors
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(3):262-268
Abstract
Original ArticleAged patients with respiratory dysfunction: epidemiological profile and mortality risk factors
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(3):262-268
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000300005
Views48See moreOBJECTIVES: To describe the population of aged as compared to young patients under mechanical ventilation and to analyze the mortality risk factors of this group in an intensive care unit. METHODS: This was a prospective observational trial in patients over 18 years of age, admitted in an intensive care unit and under mechanical ventilation, during one year. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: Group 1 - patients over 65 years old; and Group 2, 65 years old or younger. RESULTS: eighty one mechanic ventilation patients were included, 62 aged and 18 younger, mean ages from aged was 76 years, while in the younger it was 56 years. As compared to the control, aged patients had longer mechanic ventilation time , higher intensive care unit and hospital mortality: 63.1% versus 26.3% and 74.2% versus 47.4% (P<0.05), respectively. In addition, the aged under mechanic ventilation had increased desintubation failures, difficult ventilatory weaning and deaths directly related to respiratory dysfunction. The mechanic ventilation time was an independent risk factor for death in the intensive care unit in aged patients (OR= 2.7, p=0.02). The area under the ROC curve of mechanic ventilation about intensive care unit death was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.97, p (area 0.5)=0.0001), cutoff point of 4 days, sensitivity 89.4% and specificity 77.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanic ventilation patients over 65years of age have a worse prognosis than the younger, and the longer the mechanic ventilation time, the higher will be intensive care mortality.
Views48Abstract
Original ArticleAged patients with respiratory dysfunction: epidemiological profile and mortality risk factors
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2009;21(3):262-268
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000300005
Views48See moreOBJECTIVES: To describe the population of aged as compared to young patients under mechanical ventilation and to analyze the mortality risk factors of this group in an intensive care unit. METHODS: This was a prospective observational trial in patients over 18 years of age, admitted in an intensive care unit and under mechanical ventilation, during one year. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: Group 1 - patients over 65 years old; and Group 2, 65 years old or younger. RESULTS: eighty one mechanic ventilation patients were included, 62 aged and 18 younger, mean ages from aged was 76 years, while in the younger it was 56 years. As compared to the control, aged patients had longer mechanic ventilation time , higher intensive care unit and hospital mortality: 63.1% versus 26.3% and 74.2% versus 47.4% (P<0.05), respectively. In addition, the aged under mechanic ventilation had increased desintubation failures, difficult ventilatory weaning and deaths directly related to respiratory dysfunction. The mechanic ventilation time was an independent risk factor for death in the intensive care unit in aged patients (OR= 2.7, p=0.02). The area under the ROC curve of mechanic ventilation about intensive care unit death was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.97, p (area 0.5)=0.0001), cutoff point of 4 days, sensitivity 89.4% and specificity 77.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanic ventilation patients over 65years of age have a worse prognosis than the younger, and the longer the mechanic ventilation time, the higher will be intensive care mortality.
Aged Archives - Critical Care Science (CCS)
