Sepsis Archives - Critical Care Science (CCS)
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):52-58
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100010
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Establish the clinical, epidemiological and laboratorial characteristics of septic patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care private hospital from Pernambuco, in the northeast of Brazil. METHODS: Cohort study without intervention that included adult patients admitted in the ICU with sepsis or that developed it during ICU stay, during a 6-month period. The patients were followed during all ICU stay period. Laboratory and clinical data were collected after sepsis diagnosis. ICU admission APACHE II score and the SOFA score during the three first days after inclusion in the study were collected. RESULTS: The study included 199 patients, of whom 67.8% were older than 65 years of age. More than a half (56.3%) survived the septic episode, mean APACHE II was 18.2 ± 6.3 and mean SOFA score was 6.3 ± 3.7. The disease related to the admission in ICU was medical in 85.4%, and the majority of patients had a chronic associated disease. In 79.3% the lungs were the source of sepsis and in 40% of patients the etiologic agent of sepsis was isolated. Amongst laboratory tests, thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100.000/mm³) was observed on 20.6%, fibrinogen was elevated (> 300 mg/dL) on 81.7%, and the activity of antithrombin was low (< 70%) on 32.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of sepsis in this study, in a private hospital of Recife, was no different from what was recently described in Southeast and South of Brazil, United States and Europe.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):52-58
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100010
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Establish the clinical, epidemiological and laboratorial characteristics of septic patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care private hospital from Pernambuco, in the northeast of Brazil. METHODS: Cohort study without intervention that included adult patients admitted in the ICU with sepsis or that developed it during ICU stay, during a 6-month period. The patients were followed during all ICU stay period. Laboratory and clinical data were collected after sepsis diagnosis. ICU admission APACHE II score and the SOFA score during the three first days after inclusion in the study were collected. RESULTS: The study included 199 patients, of whom 67.8% were older than 65 years of age. More than a half (56.3%) survived the septic episode, mean APACHE II was 18.2 ± 6.3 and mean SOFA score was 6.3 ± 3.7. The disease related to the admission in ICU was medical in 85.4%, and the majority of patients had a chronic associated disease. In 79.3% the lungs were the source of sepsis and in 40% of patients the etiologic agent of sepsis was isolated. Amongst laboratory tests, thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100.000/mm³) was observed on 20.6%, fibrinogen was elevated (> 300 mg/dL) on 81.7%, and the activity of antithrombin was low (< 70%) on 32.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of sepsis in this study, in a private hospital of Recife, was no different from what was recently described in Southeast and South of Brazil, United States and Europe.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100003
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis represents the major cause of death in the ICUs all over the world. Many studies have shown an increasing incidence over time and only a slight reduce in mortality. Many new treatment strategies are arising and we should define the incidence and features of sepsis in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in sixty-five hospitals all over Brazil. The patients who were admitted or who developed sepsis during the month of September, 2003 were enrolled. They were followed until the 28th day and/or until their discharge. The diagnoses were made in accordance to the criteria proposed by ACCP/SCCM. It were evaluated demographic features, APACHE II score, SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score, mortality, sources of infections, microbiology, morbidities and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Seventy-five ICUs from all regions of Brazil took part in the study.3128 patients were identified and 521 (16.7%) filled the criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Mean age was 61.7 (IQR 39-79), 293 (55.7%) were males, and the overall 28-day mortality rate was 46.6%. Average APACHE II score was 20 and SOFA score on the first day was 7 (IQR 4-10). SOFA score in the mortality group was higher on day 1 (8, IQR 5-11), and had increased on day 3 (9, IQR 6-12). The mortality rate for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock was 16.7%, 34.4% and 65.3%, respectively. The average LOS was 15 days (IQR 5-22). The two main sources of infection were the respiratory tract (69%) and the abdomen one (23.1%). Gram-negative bacilli were more prevalent (40.1%). Gram-positive cocci were identified in 32.8% and fungi infections in 5%. Mechanical ventilation was observed in 82.1% of the patients, Swan-Ganz catheter in 18.8%, vasopressors in 66.2% and hemotransfusion in 44.7%. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed a high mortality of sepsis in the ICUs in Brazil. The high frequency of septic shock demonstrated a group at high risk of death. In order to have a better use of the resources and reduce in mortality during the next 5 years, it is very important to identify our specific features related to this syndrome.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100003
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis represents the major cause of death in the ICUs all over the world. Many studies have shown an increasing incidence over time and only a slight reduce in mortality. Many new treatment strategies are arising and we should define the incidence and features of sepsis in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in sixty-five hospitals all over Brazil. The patients who were admitted or who developed sepsis during the month of September, 2003 were enrolled. They were followed until the 28th day and/or until their discharge. The diagnoses were made in accordance to the criteria proposed by ACCP/SCCM. It were evaluated demographic features, APACHE II score, SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score, mortality, sources of infections, microbiology, morbidities and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Seventy-five ICUs from all regions of Brazil took part in the study.3128 patients were identified and 521 (16.7%) filled the criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Mean age was 61.7 (IQR 39-79), 293 (55.7%) were males, and the overall 28-day mortality rate was 46.6%. Average APACHE II score was 20 and SOFA score on the first day was 7 (IQR 4-10). SOFA score in the mortality group was higher on day 1 (8, IQR 5-11), and had increased on day 3 (9, IQR 6-12). The mortality rate for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock was 16.7%, 34.4% and 65.3%, respectively. The average LOS was 15 days (IQR 5-22). The two main sources of infection were the respiratory tract (69%) and the abdomen one (23.1%). Gram-negative bacilli were more prevalent (40.1%). Gram-positive cocci were identified in 32.8% and fungi infections in 5%. Mechanical ventilation was observed in 82.1% of the patients, Swan-Ganz catheter in 18.8%, vasopressors in 66.2% and hemotransfusion in 44.7%. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed a high mortality of sepsis in the ICUs in Brazil. The high frequency of septic shock demonstrated a group at high risk of death. In order to have a better use of the resources and reduce in mortality during the next 5 years, it is very important to identify our specific features related to this syndrome.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):86-94
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100014
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Corticosteroids were introduced in the treatment of severe infection as early as in the nineteen forties. Several " negative" randomized controlled trials of high-dose of glucocorticoids given for a short period of time in the early course of severe sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome raised serious doubts on the benefit of this treatment. Recently, a link between septic shock and adrenal insufficiency, or systemic inflammation induced glucocorticoids receptor resistance had been established. This finding prompted renewed interest of a replacement therapy with low doses of corticosteroids during longer periods. The goal of this article is to review the key role of corticosteroids in the host response to stress and will update the reader with the new validated indications of corticosteroids treatment in the ICU. CONTENTS: Extensive review of the adrenal physiology and its pathophysiological derangements and clinical implications in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: During sepsis, hemodynamic instability and perpetuation of inflammatory state may result from adrenal insufficiency (AI). Thus, an ACTH test should be performed as soon as possible to identify non overt AI. It should be immediately followed by a replacement therapy with iv bolus of 50 mg of hydrocortisone every 6 hours combined to 50 µg of fludrocortisone once daily. When the results of the ACTH test are available, treatment should be continued for 7 days in the non responders to ACTH and withdraw in the responders. Whether responders to ACTH with high baseline cortisol levels (> 34 µg/dL) have tissue resistance to cortisol and also should receive exogenous hormones remains to be evaluated in clinical trials.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(1):86-94
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100014
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Corticosteroids were introduced in the treatment of severe infection as early as in the nineteen forties. Several " negative" randomized controlled trials of high-dose of glucocorticoids given for a short period of time in the early course of severe sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome raised serious doubts on the benefit of this treatment. Recently, a link between septic shock and adrenal insufficiency, or systemic inflammation induced glucocorticoids receptor resistance had been established. This finding prompted renewed interest of a replacement therapy with low doses of corticosteroids during longer periods. The goal of this article is to review the key role of corticosteroids in the host response to stress and will update the reader with the new validated indications of corticosteroids treatment in the ICU. CONTENTS: Extensive review of the adrenal physiology and its pathophysiological derangements and clinical implications in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: During sepsis, hemodynamic instability and perpetuation of inflammatory state may result from adrenal insufficiency (AI). Thus, an ACTH test should be performed as soon as possible to identify non overt AI. It should be immediately followed by a replacement therapy with iv bolus of 50 mg of hydrocortisone every 6 hours combined to 50 µg of fludrocortisone once daily. When the results of the ACTH test are available, treatment should be continued for 7 days in the non responders to ACTH and withdraw in the responders. Whether responders to ACTH with high baseline cortisol levels (> 34 µg/dL) have tissue resistance to cortisol and also should receive exogenous hormones remains to be evaluated in clinical trials.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008;20(1):49-56
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2008000100008
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Norepinephrine and dopamine are used, in the state of shock, with the intention of offering hemodynamic support and to reestablish tissue perfusion. The pharmacological effects of these vasopressors can be diverse, for this reason, their use requires, through the clinician, an interpretation of the hemodynamic effects with observation of the systemic variations and region. With this in mind, the objective of this study was to analyze the publications regarding the effects of norepinephrine and low-dose dopamine in hepatosplenic perfusion and renal in treatment of septic shock. METHODS: Articles were selected (n = 27) concerning the use of norepinephrine and dopamine in septic shock, published during the period of 1997 to September 2007, revised in PubMed, data base of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). The MESH method was utilized with the descriptors norepinephrine, dopamine and sepsis. RESULTS: The effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in kidney perfusion are similar; there is an increase in diuresis and no change in creatinine clearance. Norepinephrine did not affect kidney tissue perfusion in spite of the increase of vascular tone. Regarding the splancnic effects, these drugs showed an increase in blood flow, though redistributing the blood in this compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The best agent for the hemodynamic reestablishment that keeps the adequate regional perfusion remains inconclusive.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008;20(1):49-56
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2008000100008
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Norepinephrine and dopamine are used, in the state of shock, with the intention of offering hemodynamic support and to reestablish tissue perfusion. The pharmacological effects of these vasopressors can be diverse, for this reason, their use requires, through the clinician, an interpretation of the hemodynamic effects with observation of the systemic variations and region. With this in mind, the objective of this study was to analyze the publications regarding the effects of norepinephrine and low-dose dopamine in hepatosplenic perfusion and renal in treatment of septic shock. METHODS: Articles were selected (n = 27) concerning the use of norepinephrine and dopamine in septic shock, published during the period of 1997 to September 2007, revised in PubMed, data base of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). The MESH method was utilized with the descriptors norepinephrine, dopamine and sepsis. RESULTS: The effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in kidney perfusion are similar; there is an increase in diuresis and no change in creatinine clearance. Norepinephrine did not affect kidney tissue perfusion in spite of the increase of vascular tone. Regarding the splancnic effects, these drugs showed an increase in blood flow, though redistributing the blood in this compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The best agent for the hemodynamic reestablishment that keeps the adequate regional perfusion remains inconclusive.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(4):402-406
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000400014
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a syndrome with an important inflammatory component in its pathophysiology. Some drugs that act on the activation of inflammatory cascade have been tested in septic patients. Statins, beyond hypolipemic effects, have anti-inflammatory capacities, known as pleiotropic effects. That action may be of value on sepsis treatment. Review of publications who discuss the use of statins. This article has the objective to review the mainly papers about statins and sepses. METHODS: Original published articles were searched using Medline database crossing the keys words "sepsis and statins" between 1990 and 2006 RESULTS: Experimental and retrospective studies has been investigated the use of statins in septic patients, until this moment, most of then show benefits on morbidity and mortality. However, there is not prospective, randomized, placebo controlled trials. Or metanalyses, witch denotes lack strong and robust that could be indicated this action. So, since the benefit is still unable, it is necessary randomized clinical trials witch can prove this theory. CONCLUSIONS: Several experimental and retrospective studies have investigated the use of statins in septic patients, but despite literature demonstrating a promising role for its use in these patients, these studies are experimental or retrospective. Therefore, we must wait larger, prospective, randomized trials before we may be able to understand its role and possibly recommend these drugs in the treatment of septic patients.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(4):402-406
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000400014
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a syndrome with an important inflammatory component in its pathophysiology. Some drugs that act on the activation of inflammatory cascade have been tested in septic patients. Statins, beyond hypolipemic effects, have anti-inflammatory capacities, known as pleiotropic effects. That action may be of value on sepsis treatment. Review of publications who discuss the use of statins. This article has the objective to review the mainly papers about statins and sepses. METHODS: Original published articles were searched using Medline database crossing the keys words "sepsis and statins" between 1990 and 2006 RESULTS: Experimental and retrospective studies has been investigated the use of statins in septic patients, until this moment, most of then show benefits on morbidity and mortality. However, there is not prospective, randomized, placebo controlled trials. Or metanalyses, witch denotes lack strong and robust that could be indicated this action. So, since the benefit is still unable, it is necessary randomized clinical trials witch can prove this theory. CONCLUSIONS: Several experimental and retrospective studies have investigated the use of statins in septic patients, but despite literature demonstrating a promising role for its use in these patients, these studies are experimental or retrospective. Therefore, we must wait larger, prospective, randomized trials before we may be able to understand its role and possibly recommend these drugs in the treatment of septic patients.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(4):418-422
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000400017
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Severe sepsis represents the systemic inflammatory response resulting from an infection, associated with one of the following: cardiovascular organ dysfunction, acute respiratory distress syndrome or two or more organ dysfunctions. Although the mortality rate from sepsis in children has steadily decreased in the last decades, the mortality rate in newborns remains high (20% to 40%) despite the development in intensive care. The authors describe a newborn who suffered from sepsis, shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndromes (MODS) that recovered after the administration of activated C protein. CASE REPORT: A premature newborn underwent cesarean section because of a premature rupture of membranes and acute fetal distress. The newborn developed acute respiratory distress due to intrauterine pneumonia and was taken to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The patient was given mechanical ventilation, exogenous pulmonary surfactant and antibiotics early in the treatment. Nevertheless, he developed persistent pulmonary hypertension and shock. The control of the infection was difficult, despite the adjustment of the antibiotics, resulting in the development of MODS. On the 28th day, activated C protein was given to the patient. The administration of the drug was successful and the patient recovered from the organ dysfunction without bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The activated C protein can't be recommended as a routine in the treatment of newborns with severe sepsis. However, in this case, it contributed to the recovery of the organ dysfunctions presented by the patient.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(4):418-422
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000400017
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Severe sepsis represents the systemic inflammatory response resulting from an infection, associated with one of the following: cardiovascular organ dysfunction, acute respiratory distress syndrome or two or more organ dysfunctions. Although the mortality rate from sepsis in children has steadily decreased in the last decades, the mortality rate in newborns remains high (20% to 40%) despite the development in intensive care. The authors describe a newborn who suffered from sepsis, shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndromes (MODS) that recovered after the administration of activated C protein. CASE REPORT: A premature newborn underwent cesarean section because of a premature rupture of membranes and acute fetal distress. The newborn developed acute respiratory distress due to intrauterine pneumonia and was taken to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The patient was given mechanical ventilation, exogenous pulmonary surfactant and antibiotics early in the treatment. Nevertheless, he developed persistent pulmonary hypertension and shock. The control of the infection was difficult, despite the adjustment of the antibiotics, resulting in the development of MODS. On the 28th day, activated C protein was given to the patient. The administration of the drug was successful and the patient recovered from the organ dysfunction without bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The activated C protein can't be recommended as a routine in the treatment of newborns with severe sepsis. However, in this case, it contributed to the recovery of the organ dysfunctions presented by the patient.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(2):210-215
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000200012
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is the expression of a complex network of mediators. Multiple organ dysfunction and septic shock indeed remain a major cause of death among ICU patients worldwide. Prompt recognition of both the diagnosis and the complicated evolution are essential, hence the importance of using biological markers. The main pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as well as hundreds of others cellular markers, circulating bioactive molecules or coagulation products are potential biological markers that could help to characterize the presence of infection and sepsis. We aimed to review the main biological markers that could be used nowadays or possibly in the future, either in clinical or research fields. CONTENTS: A selective review of biologic markers of sepsis focusing on markers of the coagulation cascade, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the available biological markers is still not a practical method to be used at the bed-side and is currently restricted to research works. Nowadays the determination of CRP or PCT serum levels can be of great help in the critically ill patient care along with the conventional parameters.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(2):210-215
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000200012
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is the expression of a complex network of mediators. Multiple organ dysfunction and septic shock indeed remain a major cause of death among ICU patients worldwide. Prompt recognition of both the diagnosis and the complicated evolution are essential, hence the importance of using biological markers. The main pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as well as hundreds of others cellular markers, circulating bioactive molecules or coagulation products are potential biological markers that could help to characterize the presence of infection and sepsis. We aimed to review the main biological markers that could be used nowadays or possibly in the future, either in clinical or research fields. CONTENTS: A selective review of biologic markers of sepsis focusing on markers of the coagulation cascade, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the available biological markers is still not a practical method to be used at the bed-side and is currently restricted to research works. Nowadays the determination of CRP or PCT serum levels can be of great help in the critically ill patient care along with the conventional parameters.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(2):242-244
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000200018
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis during pregnancy is a rare complication. This potentially fatal disease often occurs due to maternal infectious and can lead to fetal loss. Therefore, any attempted treatment must be aimed at the mother’s well being. As a matter of fact, there are few recent medical publications about sepsis in pregnancy. In spite of this, the treatment based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign seems suitable and practical. The aim of this article is making a case report highlighting a very well succeeded treatment of a pregnant woman with urinary sepsis. CASE REPORT: A 22 year old in her 27th week of pregnancy is hospitalized with pyelonefhritis. One day later, she begins presenting signs of sepsis and unresponsive hypoxemia, resulting in intubation. Afterwards, she evolved with persistent low blood pressure that was unresponsive to volume expansion and had to be put on vasopressor medication. She received intensive care support based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The patient evolved with an important improvement of her ventilatory stats and was extubated. After completing antibiotic treatment, she was discharged and delivered a healthy baby after 42 weeks pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis in pregnancy is a rare and potentially fatal complication. The main treatment is based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The patient had an outstanding improvement and overcame her condition after intensive care support.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(2):242-244
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000200018
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis during pregnancy is a rare complication. This potentially fatal disease often occurs due to maternal infectious and can lead to fetal loss. Therefore, any attempted treatment must be aimed at the mother’s well being. As a matter of fact, there are few recent medical publications about sepsis in pregnancy. In spite of this, the treatment based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign seems suitable and practical. The aim of this article is making a case report highlighting a very well succeeded treatment of a pregnant woman with urinary sepsis. CASE REPORT: A 22 year old in her 27th week of pregnancy is hospitalized with pyelonefhritis. One day later, she begins presenting signs of sepsis and unresponsive hypoxemia, resulting in intubation. Afterwards, she evolved with persistent low blood pressure that was unresponsive to volume expansion and had to be put on vasopressor medication. She received intensive care support based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The patient evolved with an important improvement of her ventilatory stats and was extubated. After completing antibiotic treatment, she was discharged and delivered a healthy baby after 42 weeks pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis in pregnancy is a rare and potentially fatal complication. The main treatment is based on Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The patient had an outstanding improvement and overcame her condition after intensive care support.
