Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)
You searched for:"Gustavo Nobre"
We found (3) results for your search.Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008;20(2):160-164
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2008000200008
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nosocomial catheter related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) increase morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Central venous catheters (CVC) coated with rifampin and minocycline (RM) decrease rates of colonization and CR-BSI. However, recent trials challenged the clinical impact of such catheters. We designed this trial to compare rates of colonization and CR-BSI in RM catheters and controls in a cohort of critically ill patients in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective, controlled trial conducted in one medico-surgical ICU. Patients were assigned to receive a control or RM CVC. After removal, tips were cultured in association with blood cultures. Rates of colonization and CR-BSI were recorded. RESULTS: Among 120 catheters inserted, 100 could be evaluated, 49 in the uncoated and 51 in the coated group. Clinical characteristics of patients were similar in the two groups. Two cases of CR-BSI (3.9%) occurred in patients who received RM catheters compared with 5 (10.2%) in the uncoated group (p = 0.26). Six RM catheters (11.8%) were colonized compared with 14 (28.6%) control catheters (p = 0.036). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of colonization or CR-BSI. Rates of CR-BSI were 4.7 per 1000 catheter-days in the RM coated group compared to 11.4 per 1000 catheter days in the uncoated group (p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we showed lower rates of colonization in RM coated when compared with uncoated catheters. Incidence and rates of CR-BSI were similar in the two groups.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008;20(2):160-164
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2008000200008
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nosocomial catheter related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) increase morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Central venous catheters (CVC) coated with rifampin and minocycline (RM) decrease rates of colonization and CR-BSI. However, recent trials challenged the clinical impact of such catheters. We designed this trial to compare rates of colonization and CR-BSI in RM catheters and controls in a cohort of critically ill patients in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective, controlled trial conducted in one medico-surgical ICU. Patients were assigned to receive a control or RM CVC. After removal, tips were cultured in association with blood cultures. Rates of colonization and CR-BSI were recorded. RESULTS: Among 120 catheters inserted, 100 could be evaluated, 49 in the uncoated and 51 in the coated group. Clinical characteristics of patients were similar in the two groups. Two cases of CR-BSI (3.9%) occurred in patients who received RM catheters compared with 5 (10.2%) in the uncoated group (p = 0.26). Six RM catheters (11.8%) were colonized compared with 14 (28.6%) control catheters (p = 0.036). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of colonization or CR-BSI. Rates of CR-BSI were 4.7 per 1000 catheter-days in the RM coated group compared to 11.4 per 1000 catheter days in the uncoated group (p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we showed lower rates of colonization in RM coated when compared with uncoated catheters. Incidence and rates of CR-BSI were similar in the two groups.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011;23(3):304-311
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2011000300008
OBJECTIVES: Ascending aortic dissection has a poor prognosis if it is not promptly corrected surgically. Even with surgical correction, postoperative management is feared because of its complicated course. Our aim was to describe the incidence of postoperative complications and identify the 1 and 6-month mortality rate of our ascending aortic dissection surgical cohort. Secondarily, a comparison was made between ascending aortic dissection patients and paired-matched patients who received urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively-collected database from February 2005 through June 2008 revealed 12 ascending aortic dissection and 10 elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair patients. These patients were analyzed for demographic and perioperative characteristics. Ascending aortic dissection patients were compared to paired-matched coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients according to age (± 3 years), gender, elective/urgent procedure and surgical team. The main outcome was in-hospital morbidity, defined by postoperative complications, intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received operations to correct ascending aortic dissections and ascending aortic aneurysms, while 246 patients received coronary artery bypass graft surgeries. Ascending aortic dissection patients were notably similar to ascending aortic aneurysm brackets, except for longer mechanical ventilation times and lengths of stay in the hospital. After matching coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients to an ascending aortic dissection group, the following significantly worse results were found for the Aorta group: higher incidence of postoperative complications (91% vs. 45%, p=0.03), and longer hospital length of stay (19 [11-41] vs. 12.5 [8.5-13] days, p=0.05). No difference in mortality was found at the 1-month (8.3%) or 6-month (16.6%) postoperative care date. CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic dissection correction is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications and an increased hospital length of stay, but 1 and 6-month mortality is similar to that of paired-matched coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011;23(3):304-311
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2011000300008
OBJECTIVES: Ascending aortic dissection has a poor prognosis if it is not promptly corrected surgically. Even with surgical correction, postoperative management is feared because of its complicated course. Our aim was to describe the incidence of postoperative complications and identify the 1 and 6-month mortality rate of our ascending aortic dissection surgical cohort. Secondarily, a comparison was made between ascending aortic dissection patients and paired-matched patients who received urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively-collected database from February 2005 through June 2008 revealed 12 ascending aortic dissection and 10 elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair patients. These patients were analyzed for demographic and perioperative characteristics. Ascending aortic dissection patients were compared to paired-matched coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients according to age (± 3 years), gender, elective/urgent procedure and surgical team. The main outcome was in-hospital morbidity, defined by postoperative complications, intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received operations to correct ascending aortic dissections and ascending aortic aneurysms, while 246 patients received coronary artery bypass graft surgeries. Ascending aortic dissection patients were notably similar to ascending aortic aneurysm brackets, except for longer mechanical ventilation times and lengths of stay in the hospital. After matching coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients to an ascending aortic dissection group, the following significantly worse results were found for the Aorta group: higher incidence of postoperative complications (91% vs. 45%, p=0.03), and longer hospital length of stay (19 [11-41] vs. 12.5 [8.5-13] days, p=0.05). No difference in mortality was found at the 1-month (8.3%) or 6-month (16.6%) postoperative care date. CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic dissection correction is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications and an increased hospital length of stay, but 1 and 6-month mortality is similar to that of paired-matched coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(4):349-352
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000400003
OBJECTIVES: Arterial pulse pressure respiratory variation is a good predictor of fluid response in ventilated patients. Recently, it was shown that respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure correlates with variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude. We wanted to evaluate the correlation between respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude, and to determine whether this correlation was influenced by norepinephrine administration. METHODS: Prospective study of sixty patients with normal sinus rhythm on mechanical ventilation, profoundly sedated and with stable hemodynamics. Oxygenation index and invasive arterial pressure were monitored. Respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude were recorded simultaneously in a beat-to-beat evaluation, and were compared using the Pearson coefficient of agreement and linear regression. RESULTS: Thirty patients (50%) required norepinephrine. There was a significant correlation (K = 0.66; p < 0.001) between respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude. Area under the ROC curve was 0.88 (range, 0.79 - 0.97), with a best cutoff value of 14% to predict a respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure of 13. The use of norepinephrine did not influence the correlation (K = 0.63, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure above 13% can be accurately predicted by a respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude of 14%. The use of norepinephrine does not alter this relationship.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(4):349-352
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000400003
OBJECTIVES: Arterial pulse pressure respiratory variation is a good predictor of fluid response in ventilated patients. Recently, it was shown that respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure correlates with variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude. We wanted to evaluate the correlation between respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude, and to determine whether this correlation was influenced by norepinephrine administration. METHODS: Prospective study of sixty patients with normal sinus rhythm on mechanical ventilation, profoundly sedated and with stable hemodynamics. Oxygenation index and invasive arterial pressure were monitored. Respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude were recorded simultaneously in a beat-to-beat evaluation, and were compared using the Pearson coefficient of agreement and linear regression. RESULTS: Thirty patients (50%) required norepinephrine. There was a significant correlation (K = 0.66; p < 0.001) between respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure and respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude. Area under the ROC curve was 0.88 (range, 0.79 - 0.97), with a best cutoff value of 14% to predict a respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure of 13. The use of norepinephrine did not influence the correlation (K = 0.63, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure above 13% can be accurately predicted by a respiratory variation in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude of 14%. The use of norepinephrine does not alter this relationship.
