Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Eduardo Kattan"

We found (2) results for your search.
  • Editorial

    Challenges and limitations of using ventilator-free days as an outcome in critical care trials

    Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240088en

    Abstract

    Editorial

    Challenges and limitations of using ventilator-free days as an outcome in critical care trials

    Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240088en

    DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20240088-en

    Views1
    The use of ventilator-free days (VFDs) as an outcome measure is increasingly popular in critical care research.(-) This composite outcome simultaneously reflects patient survival and the time not spent on mechanical ventilation (MV) within a specified timeframe, which usually extends from randomization up to Day 28. For patients who do not survive this period, VFDs […]
    See more
  • SPECIAL ARTICLE

    Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2022;34(1):96-106

    Abstract

    SPECIAL ARTICLE

    Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2022;34(1):96-106

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20220004-en

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Background:

    Early reversion of sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion is essential for survival in septic shock. However, consensus regarding the best initial resuscitation strategy is lacking given that interventions designed for the entire population with septic shock might produce unnecessary fluid administration. This article reports the rationale, study design and analysis plan of the ANDROMEDA-2 study, which aims to determine whether a peripheral perfusion-guided strategy consisting of capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation based on clinical and hemodynamic phenotypes is associated with a decrease in a composite outcome of mortality, time to organ support cessation, and hospital length of stay compared to standard care in patients with early (< 4 hours of diagnosis) septic shock.

    Methods:

    The ANDROMEDA-2 study is a multicenter, multinational randomized controlled trial. In the intervention group, capillary refill time will be measured hourly for 6 hours. If abnormal, patients will enter an algorithm starting with pulse pressure assessment. Patients with pulse pressure less than 40mmHg will be tested for fluid responsiveness and receive fluids accordingly. In patients with pulse pressure > 40mmHg, norepinephrine will be titrated to maintain diastolic arterial pressure > 50mmHg. Patients who fail to normalize capillary refill time after the previous steps will be subjected to critical care echocardiography for cardiac dysfunction evaluation and subsequent management. Finally, vasopressor and inodilator tests will be performed to further optimize perfusion. A sample size of 1,500 patients will provide 88% power to demonstrate superiority of the capillary refill time-targeted strategy.

    Conclusions:

    If hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation demonstrates to be a superior strategy, care processes in septic shock resuscitation can be optimized with bedside tools.

    See more
    Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Section
Article
Articles
Artigo de Revisão
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original - Enfermagem
Artigo Original - Neonatologia
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos Originais
Artigos Originais - Pesquisa Báscia
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
CARTA AO EDITOR
CARTAS AO EDITOR
CARTAS AO EDITOR
Case Report
CASE REPORTS
Clinical Report
Comentário
Comentários
COMMENTARIES
COMMENTARY
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondência
Editorial
EDITORIALS
ERRATA
Erratum
III Consenso Brasileiro de Ventilação Mecância
Informação Clínica
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Neonatologia
Original Article - Pediatria
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Original Articles - Basic Research
Original Articles - Clinical Research
Ponto de Vista
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Research Letter
RESPOSTA DOS AUTORES
REVIEW ARTICLE
Review Articles
REVISÃO
Série: Medicina baseada em evidências e terapia intensiva
Série: Terminalidade em UTI
SPECIAL ARTICLE
SPECIAL ARTICLES
Terminalidade em UTI pediátrica
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE