Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)
You searched for:"José Rodolfo Rocco"
We found (3) results for your search.Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2010;22(1):11-18
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2010000100004
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of cirrhotic patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort of cirrhotic patients admitted to two intensive care unit between June 1999 to September 2004. We collected demographic, comorbid conditions, diagnosis, vital signs, laboratory data, prognostic scores and evolution in intensive care unit and hospital. The patients were divided in groups: non surgical, non liver surgery, surgery for portal hypertension, liver surgery, liver transplantation, and urgent surgery. RESULTS: We studied 304 patients, which 190 (62.5%) were male. The median of age was 54 (47-61) years. The mortality rate in intensive care unit and hospital were 29.3 and 39.8%, respectively, more elevated than in the other patients admitted critically ill patients (19.6 and 28.3%; p<0.001). Non surgical patients and those submitted to urgent surgery presented high mortality rate in the intensive care unit (64.3 and 65.4%) and in the hospital (80.4 and 76.9%). The variables related to hospital mortality were [Odds ratio (confidence interval 95%)]: mean arterial pressure [0.985 (0.974-0.997)]; mechanical ventilation in the first 24 h [4.080 (1.990-8.364)]; confirmed infection in the first 24 h [7.899 (2.814-22.175)]; acute renal failure [5.509 (1.708-17.766)] and APACHE II score (points) [1.078 (1.017-1.143)]. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic patients had higher mortality rate compared to non cirrhotic critically ill patients. Those admitted after urgent surgery and non surgical had higher mortality rate.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2010;22(1):11-18
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2010000100004
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of cirrhotic patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort of cirrhotic patients admitted to two intensive care unit between June 1999 to September 2004. We collected demographic, comorbid conditions, diagnosis, vital signs, laboratory data, prognostic scores and evolution in intensive care unit and hospital. The patients were divided in groups: non surgical, non liver surgery, surgery for portal hypertension, liver surgery, liver transplantation, and urgent surgery. RESULTS: We studied 304 patients, which 190 (62.5%) were male. The median of age was 54 (47-61) years. The mortality rate in intensive care unit and hospital were 29.3 and 39.8%, respectively, more elevated than in the other patients admitted critically ill patients (19.6 and 28.3%; p<0.001). Non surgical patients and those submitted to urgent surgery presented high mortality rate in the intensive care unit (64.3 and 65.4%) and in the hospital (80.4 and 76.9%). The variables related to hospital mortality were [Odds ratio (confidence interval 95%)]: mean arterial pressure [0.985 (0.974-0.997)]; mechanical ventilation in the first 24 h [4.080 (1.990-8.364)]; confirmed infection in the first 24 h [7.899 (2.814-22.175)]; acute renal failure [5.509 (1.708-17.766)] and APACHE II score (points) [1.078 (1.017-1.143)]. CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic patients had higher mortality rate compared to non cirrhotic critically ill patients. Those admitted after urgent surgery and non surgical had higher mortality rate.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(2):114-120
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000200002
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on the outcomes of patients who were refused to the ICU is limited. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical characteristics of patients who were admitted with those of patients who were refused to the ICU and to identify clinical parameters associated with triage procedures. METHODS: Observational prospective cohort study. The following data were collected using a standard questionnaire: comorbidities, acute illness, vital status, laboratory data and APACHE II score. The end-points of interest were admission to the ICU and vital status at hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 455 patients were studied; 254 (56%) were admitted and 201 (44%) were not. The main reason for the refuse of admission was the lack of ICU beds (82%). Patients who were not admitted had a higher mortality (85% vs. 61%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the following variables were associated to non-admission [odds ratio, (95% confidence interval)]: metastatic cancer [5.6(1.7-18.7)], arterial systolic pressure < 90 mmHg [5.2(3.0-8.8)], age > 70 years [4.0(2.4-6.5)], hepatic cirrhosis [3.7(1.8-7.6)], and Glasgow coma scale < 5 [3.6(1.9-6.9)]. The variables associated with ICU admission were: mechanical ventilation [0.5(0.3-0.7)] and acute coronary syndromes [0.1(0.03-0.6)]. CONCLUSIONS: Refusal of ICU admission is frequent and generally as a consequence of ICU beds shortage. Patients who were not admitted had a higher mortality. Clinical characteristics associated with the refusal of admission were identified suggesting that they are used in clinical decision-making for ICU triage.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(2):114-120
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000200002
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on the outcomes of patients who were refused to the ICU is limited. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical characteristics of patients who were admitted with those of patients who were refused to the ICU and to identify clinical parameters associated with triage procedures. METHODS: Observational prospective cohort study. The following data were collected using a standard questionnaire: comorbidities, acute illness, vital status, laboratory data and APACHE II score. The end-points of interest were admission to the ICU and vital status at hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 455 patients were studied; 254 (56%) were admitted and 201 (44%) were not. The main reason for the refuse of admission was the lack of ICU beds (82%). Patients who were not admitted had a higher mortality (85% vs. 61%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the following variables were associated to non-admission [odds ratio, (95% confidence interval)]: metastatic cancer [5.6(1.7-18.7)], arterial systolic pressure < 90 mmHg [5.2(3.0-8.8)], age > 70 years [4.0(2.4-6.5)], hepatic cirrhosis [3.7(1.8-7.6)], and Glasgow coma scale < 5 [3.6(1.9-6.9)]. The variables associated with ICU admission were: mechanical ventilation [0.5(0.3-0.7)] and acute coronary syndromes [0.1(0.03-0.6)]. CONCLUSIONS: Refusal of ICU admission is frequent and generally as a consequence of ICU beds shortage. Patients who were not admitted had a higher mortality. Clinical characteristics associated with the refusal of admission were identified suggesting that they are used in clinical decision-making for ICU triage.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(3):242-250
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000300005
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU). However, the consequences of anemia in ICU patients are poorly understood. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, indications, pre-transfusion hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and outcomes of ICU patients transfused with PRBC. METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted at a medical-surgical ICU of a teaching hospital during a 16-month period. Patients' demographic, clinical, laboratory and transfusion-related data were collected. Logistic regression was used after univariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 698 patients were evaluated and 244 (35%) received PRBC, mainly within the first four days of ICU (82.4%). Transfusion was more frequent in medical and emergency surgical patients. The mean pre-transfusion hematocrit and hemoglobin were 22.8% ± 4.5% and 7.9 ± 1.4 g/dL, respectively. Transfused patients received 4.4 ± 3.7 PRBC during ICU stay and 2.2 ± 1 PRBC at each transfusion. The ICU (39.8% versus 13.2%; p < 0.0001) and hospital (48.8% versus 20.3%; p < 0.0001) mortality rates were higher in transfused patients. Mortality increased as the number of transfused PRBC increased (R² = 0.91). In logistic regression, predictive factors for PRBC transfusion were hepatic cirrhosis, mechanical ventilation (MV), type and duration of ICU admission, and hematocrit. The independent factors associated to hospital mortality were MV, transfusions of more than five PRBC and SAPS II score. CONCLUSIONS: PRBC transfusions are frequent in ICU patients, especially in those with medical and emergency surgical complications, longer ICU stay, and hepatic cirrhosis and in need of MV. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels were lower than those previously reported. In our study, PRBC transfusion was associated with increased mortality.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(3):242-250
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000300005
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU). However, the consequences of anemia in ICU patients are poorly understood. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, indications, pre-transfusion hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and outcomes of ICU patients transfused with PRBC. METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted at a medical-surgical ICU of a teaching hospital during a 16-month period. Patients' demographic, clinical, laboratory and transfusion-related data were collected. Logistic regression was used after univariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 698 patients were evaluated and 244 (35%) received PRBC, mainly within the first four days of ICU (82.4%). Transfusion was more frequent in medical and emergency surgical patients. The mean pre-transfusion hematocrit and hemoglobin were 22.8% ± 4.5% and 7.9 ± 1.4 g/dL, respectively. Transfused patients received 4.4 ± 3.7 PRBC during ICU stay and 2.2 ± 1 PRBC at each transfusion. The ICU (39.8% versus 13.2%; p < 0.0001) and hospital (48.8% versus 20.3%; p < 0.0001) mortality rates were higher in transfused patients. Mortality increased as the number of transfused PRBC increased (R² = 0.91). In logistic regression, predictive factors for PRBC transfusion were hepatic cirrhosis, mechanical ventilation (MV), type and duration of ICU admission, and hematocrit. The independent factors associated to hospital mortality were MV, transfusions of more than five PRBC and SAPS II score. CONCLUSIONS: PRBC transfusions are frequent in ICU patients, especially in those with medical and emergency surgical complications, longer ICU stay, and hepatic cirrhosis and in need of MV. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels were lower than those previously reported. In our study, PRBC transfusion was associated with increased mortality.
