Search - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"José Artur Osório de Carvalho Paiva"

We found (2) results for your search.
  • Review Articles

    Biomarkers of renal recovery after acute kidney injury

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(3):373-381

    Abstract

    Review Articles

    Biomarkers of renal recovery after acute kidney injury

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(3):373-381

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170051

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Novel biomarkers can be suitable for early acute kidney injury diagnosis and the prediction of the need for dialysis. It remains unclear whether such biomarkers may also play a role in the prediction of recovery after established acute kidney injury or in aiding the decision of when to stop renal support therapy. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for studies that reported on the epidemiology of renal recovery after acute kidney injury, the risk factors of recovery versus non-recovery after acute kidney injury, and potential biomarkers of acute kidney injury recovery. The reference lists of these articles and relevant review articles were also reviewed. Final references were selected for inclusion in the review based on their relevance. New biomarkers exhibited a potential role in the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury recovery. Urine HGF, IGFBP-7, TIMP-2 and NGAL may improve our ability to predict the odds and timing of recovery and eventually renal support withdrawal. Acute kidney injury recovery requires more study, and its definition needs to be standardized to allow for better and more powerful research on biomarkers because some of them show potential for the prediction of acute kidney injury recovery.

    See more
  • Original Articles

    Prognostics factors for mortality and renal recovery in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016;28(1):70-77

    Abstract

    Original Articles

    Prognostics factors for mortality and renal recovery in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016;28(1):70-77

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20160015

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    Identify prognostic factors related to mortality and non-recovery of renal function.

    Methods:

    A prospective single-center study was conducted at the intensive care medicine department of a university hospital between 2012 and 2015. Patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy were included in the study. Clinical and analytical parameters were collected, and the reasons for initiation and discontinuation of renal replacement therapy were examined.

    Results:

    A total of 41 patients were included in the study, of whom 43.9% had sepsis. The median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPSII) was 56 and the mortality was 53.7%, with a predicted mortality of 59.8%. The etiology of acute kidney injury was often multifactorial (56.1%). Survivors had lower cumulative fluid balance (median = 3,600mL, interquartile range [IQR] = 1,175 – 8,025) than non-survivors (median = 12,000mL, IQR = 6,625 – 17,875; p = 0.004). Patients who recovered renal function (median = 51.0, IQR = 45.8 – 56.2) had lower SAPS II than those who do not recover renal function (median = 73, IQR = 54 – 85; p = 0.005) as well as lower fluid balance (median = 3,850, IQR = 1,425 – 8,025 versus median = 11,500, IQR = 6,625 – 16,275; p = 0.004).

    Conclusions:

    SAPS II at admission and cumulative fluid balance during renal support therapy were risk factors for mortality and non-recovery of renal function among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury needing renal replacement therapy.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Session
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article – Basic Research
Original Article – Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles – Basic Research
Original Articles – Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE