You searched for:"Cristina Aparecida Veloso"
We found (2) results for your search.Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(3):256-262
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000300007
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no literature consensus about the time of airway occlusion sufficient enough to get a true PImax during weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV). So, the main objectives of the present study were to compare two methods PImax measurement and to evaluate the influence of patients' level of conscience on them. METHODS: The population was composed by 28 general ICU patients, with MV > 48h, in a weaning process, divided into two groups according to Glasgow coma scale score: with (GCS < 15) and without (GCS = 15) alterations of conscience level. The airway was occluded by using an unidirectional valve for 20s (PImaxT20), or for a maximum time of one minute if a plateau of inspiratory pressure was not observed during three consecutive inspirations (PImaxTid). RESULTS: PImaxT20 (mean ± SD, cmH2O) values were similar in both groups (44 ± 16 vs42 ± 15, p = 0.52). However, PImaxTid values, as long as the time needed to their attainment, were greater in GCS < 15 group (65 ± 24 vs 47 ± 23cmH2O and 37 ± 10 vs24 ± 8s, p = 0.04 and 0.0019, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The method commonly used of 20s airway occlusion seems to be inadequate to get the true PImax in patients with alterations of the level of conscience. Additional studies, now in a more homogeneous group (e. g.: patients with structural brain lesion), are needed to clarify these findings.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(3):310-316
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000300007
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The cuff leak test aims to evaluate the presence of airway obstruction and normally is carried through in the controlled mode of mechanical ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff leak in patients breathing spontaneously, across three different methods, and to compare them. METHODS: Twenty intubated patients had been submitted to three different forms of cuff leak test, all of them in spontaneous respiration: measuring air leak buy using a ventilometer and with the patient connected to the mechanical ventilator (test 1); through the display of the mechanical ventilator (test 2); and with ventilometer and the patient detached from the mechanical ventilator (test 3). The air leak around the tracheal tube (TT) was defined as the percentage difference between the inspired tidal volume (insufflated cuff) and exhaled (deflated cuff). The air leak differences between the three tests were evaluated, as well as their correlations to three variables: cuff pressure, TT diameter and intubation time. RESULTS: Statistically significant (p < 0.05) air leak difference was observed between the tests 1 and 2 in relation to the test 3 in the general and regarding time intubation below 48h and cuff pressure below 20 cmH2O. Regarding the tube diameter, it had been difference only between tests 2 and 3 for 8.5 mm tubes. CONCLUSIONS: The cuff leak test in spontaneous ventilation seems to be more accurate when the patient is connected to the mechanical ventilator, and that additional studies are needed to determine the real contribution of the test in this ventilation mode to predict laryngeal edema.