Search - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Fernando Antônio Botoni"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Breathing pattern in weaning patients: comparison of two inspired oxygen fractions

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(3):292-298

    Abstract

    Breathing pattern in weaning patients: comparison of two inspired oxygen fractions

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21(3):292-298

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2009000300009

    Views0

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 40% is often used for weaning patients, but lower FiO2 values are also recommended, if arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2)/ FiO2 >150-200 mmHg. This study aimed to compare respiratory variables and vital data values recorded during use of sufficient FiO2 (ideal) to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation at 92% with values recorded during use of FiO2 established at 40% (baseline) in weaning patients. METHODS: Prospective cross-over study. Respiratory variables (respiratory frequency, tidal volume, occlusion pressure, inspiratory time/total time ratio) and vital data (blood pressure and heart rate) were collected sequentially at 30 and 60 minutes with baseline FiO2, followed by ideal FiO2. These were compared to a generalized linear model for repeated measurements. Comparisons between baseline and ideal FiO2 values, and arterial blood gases were evaluated by the Student’s t or Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: In 30 adult patients the median of ideal FiO2 was 25% (IQ25%-75% 23-28). This was significantly lower than baseline FiO2 (40%) (p< 0.001). No significant difference was found in the PaO2/ FiO2 ratio between baseline FiO2 (269±53) and ideal FiO2 (268±47). Tidal volume was significantly lower during use of ideal FiO2 (p=0.003) and blood pressure was significantly higher during use of baseline FiO2 (p=0.041), but there was no clinical significance. The remaining variables were not affected by reduction in FiO2. The ideal FiO2 did not influence remaining variables. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FiO2 levels sufficient to ensure a SpO2>92% did not alter breathing patterns or trigger clinical changes in weaning patients.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Session
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article – Basic Research
Original Article – Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles – Basic Research
Original Articles – Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE