-
Narrative Review06-04-2025
Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet): shaping the landscape of critical care research in Brazil and beyond
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250284
Abstract
Narrative ReviewBrazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet): shaping the landscape of critical care research in Brazil and beyond
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250284
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250284
Views105ABSTRACT
Critical illnesses such as sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome lead to millions of deaths globally, with a higher burden in low- and middle-income countries. Conducting multicentric clinical studies is essential to help minimize the burden of critical illnesses, particularly in areas where their impact is greater. However, conducting large-scale multicentric studies is challenging, and most large multicentric studies in critical care are from high-income countries, which limits their relevance in other contexts. This highlights the need for collaborative research networks in low- and middle-income countries to better address local needs. The Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet) was created by a group of intensivists and researchers in 2007 and is dedicated to being the leading organization in Brazil for conducting collaborative clinical research to improve care for critically ill patients. BRICNet focuses on investigator-initiated and collaborative studies relevant to global intensive care, with a special emphasis on Brazilian context. Its mission includes advancing research methodology, scientific writing, and conducting large-scale multicenter studies to fill knowledge gaps in critical care. Since its creation, the network has published 71 articles, including 15 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies, many of them in collaboration with major Brazilian institutions and international networks. This review aims to critically assess the achievements of BRICNet, highlighting its high-impact publications, international partnerships, and capacity building, which have significantly contributed to the field of intensive care. Looking ahead, we also identify barriers and solutions for sustainable growth.
Keywords:Brazilcritical carecritical illnessDeveloping countriesGlobal healthResearch designSustainable growthSee more -
Original Article05-30-2019
Availability of resources to treat sepsis in Brazil: a random sample of Brazilian institutions
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(2):193-201
Abstract
Original ArticleAvailability of resources to treat sepsis in Brazil: a random sample of Brazilian institutions
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(2):193-201
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20190033
Views104ABSTRACT
Objective:
To characterize resource availability from a nationally representative random sample of intensive care units in Brazil.
Methods:
A structured online survey of participating units in the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database (SPREAD) study, a nationwide 1-day point prevalence survey to assess the burden of sepsis in Brazil, was sent to the medical director of each unit.
Results:
A representative sample of 277 of the 317 invited units responded to the resources survey. Most of the hospitals had fewer than 500 beds (94.6%) with a median of 14 beds in the intensive care unit. Providing care for public-insured patients was the main source of income in two-thirds of the surveyed units. Own microbiology laboratory was not available for 26.8% of the surveyed intensive care units, and 10.5% did not always have access to blood cultures. Broad spectrum antibiotics were not always available in 10.5% of surveyed units, and 21.3% could not always measure lactate within three hours. Those institutions with a high resource availability (158 units, 57%) were usually larger and preferentially served patients from the private health system compared to institutions without high resource availability. Otherwise, those without high resource availability did not always have broad-spectrum antibiotics (24.4%), vasopressors (4.2%) or crystalloids (7.6%).
Conclusion:
Our study indicates that a relevant number of units cannot perform basic monitoring and therapeutic interventions in septic patients. Our results highlight major opportunities for improvement to adhere to simple but effective interventions in Brazil.
Keywords:Brazil/epidemiologycritical careDeveloping countriesEpidemiological monitoringHealth resourcesintensive care unitsSepsis/epidemiologyTherapeuticsSee more