Search - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Pedro Paulo Martins"

We found (2) results for your search.
  • Original Articles

    Reintubation of patients submitted to cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(2):180-187

    Abstract

    Original Articles

    Reintubation of patients submitted to cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(2):180-187

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170028

    Views3

    ABSTRACT

    Objectives:

    To analyze patients after cardiac surgery that needed endotracheal reintubation and identify factors associated with death and its relation with the severity scores.

    Methods:

    Retrospective analysis of information of 1,640 patients in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery between 2007 and 2015.

    Results:

    The reintubation rate was 7.26%. Of those who were reintubated, 36 (30.3%) underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, 27 (22.7%) underwent valve replacement, 25 (21.0%) underwent correction of an aneurysm, and 8 (6.7%) underwent a heart transplant. Among those with comorbidities, 54 (51.9%) were hypertensive, 22 (21.2%) were diabetic, and 10 (9.6%) had lung diseases. Among those who had complications, 61 (52.6%) had pneumonia, 50 (42.4%) developed renal failure, and 49 (51.0%) had a moderate form of the transient disturbance of gas exchange. Noninvasive ventilation was performed in 53 (44.5%) patients. The death rate was 40.3%, and mortality was higher in the group that did not receive noninvasive ventilation before reintubation (53.5%). Within the reintubated patients who died, the SOFA and APACHE II values were 7.9 ± 3.0 and 16.9 ± 4.5, respectively. Most of the reintubated patients (47.5%) belonged to the high-risk group, EuroSCORE (> 6 points).

    Conclusion:

    The reintubation rate was high, and it was related to worse SOFA, APACHE II and EuroSCORE scores. Mortality was higher in the group that did not receive noninvasive ventilation before reintubation.

    See more
  • Presence of respiratory pathogens in the oral biofilm of patients with nosocomial pneumonia

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(4):428-433

    Abstract

    Presence of respiratory pathogens in the oral biofilm of patients with nosocomial pneumonia

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(4):428-433

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000400004

    Views0

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospitalized patients receiving treatment at intensive care units (ICU) usually show poor oral hygiene, and may have the mouth and oropharingeal region colonized by pathogens involved in nosocomial pneumonia. The presence of these pathogens may increase the risk for respiratory diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of respiratory pathogens in the oral cavity of hospitalized patients at ICU. METHODS: Were included in the study 30 patients from Hospital Raul Sertã, Nova Friburgo, with the diagnostic of nosocomial pneumonia, and tracheal aspirate samples were cultured to identify the causing microorganisms. In addition, microbiological samples from supragingival dental plaque, tongue and respiratory tube were cultured for the presence of a panel of respiratory pathogens. RESULTS: The most frequently found bacteria in the tracheal aspirate were S. Pneumoniae 23.3% (7), P. aeruginosa 20% (6), S. aureus 13.3% (4), K. pneumoniae 13.3% (4), C. albicans 6.6% (2), a-hemolytic streptococcus 6.6% (2), Staphylococcus sp. 6.6% (2), A. calcoaceticus 3.3% (1), E. coli 3.3% (1) and E. cloacae 3.3% (1). 70% (21) of these microorganisms were found in the dental biofilm, 63.33% (19) in tongue samples; 73.33% (22) in the respiratory tube; and 43.33% (13) in all sampling sites simultaneously. No differences in proportions could be observed between the sampling sites (p > 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that respiratory pathogens associated with nosocomial pneumonia are present in the oral biofilm of hospitalized patients in ICU, which may serve as a reservoir for these microorganisms.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Session
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article – Basic Research
Original Article – Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles – Basic Research
Original Articles – Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE