Search - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Antonio Paulo Nassar Jr."

We found (2) results for your search.
  • Commentaries

    Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(3):264-267

    Abstract

    Commentaries

    Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(3):264-267

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170046

    Views0
    The population of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is quite heterogeneous. Overall, the outcome of ICU treatment depends on the site, cause of admission, age, prior comorbidities, and acute physiological changes at admission and during the first several hours of treatment. Predictions of the in-hospital mortality of ICU patients play important roles […]
    See more
    Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?
  • Review Articles

    Applicability of respiratory variations in stroke volume and its surrogates for dynamic fluid responsiveness prediction in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the prevalence of required conditions

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(1):70-76

    Abstract

    Review Articles

    Applicability of respiratory variations in stroke volume and its surrogates for dynamic fluid responsiveness prediction in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the prevalence of required conditions

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(1):70-76

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170011

    Views0

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    The present systematic review searched for published data on the prevalence of required conditions for proper assessment in critically ill patients.

    Methods:

    The Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies that evaluated the prevalence of validated conditions for the fluid responsiveness assessment using respiratory variations in the stroke volume or another surrogate in adult critically ill patients. The primary outcome was the suitability of the fluid responsiveness evaluation. The secondary objectives were the type and prevalence of pre-requisites evaluated to define the suitability.

    Results:

    Five studies were included (14,804 patients). High clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 98.6%), which prevented us from pooling the results into a meaningful summary conclusion. The most frequent limitation identified is the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume ≥ 8mL/kg. The final suitability for the fluid responsiveness assessment was low (in four studies, it varied between 1.9 to 8.3%, in one study, it was 42.4%).

    Conclusion:

    Applicability of the dynamic indices of preload responsiveness requiring heart-lung interactions might be limited in daily practice.

    See more
    Applicability of respiratory variations in stroke volume and its surrogates for dynamic fluid responsiveness prediction in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the prevalence of required conditions

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Session
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article – Basic Research
Original Article – Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles – Basic Research
Original Articles – Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE