Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2011;23(1):49-55
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2011000100009
OBJECTIVE: Appropriate nutritional support is important to the outcomes of critically ill patients. However, a significant portion of these patients experience intestinal motility problems. Administration of enteral nutrition by means of tubes placed in the post-pyloric position has been suggested to improve the nutrition tolerance. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of successful post-pyloric placement using a real-time electromagnetic positioning device to the success rate using the conventional placement method. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized and controlled study, conducted in a tertiary hospital over a period of three months. The patients were randomized to one of two groups: electromagnetically guided system group, whose patients underwent real-time monitoring of post-pyloric tube placement; or the control group, whose patients underwent tube placment using to the conventional blinded technique. The rates of successful post-pyloric placement and the procedure times were assessed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, 18 in the electromagnetic group and 19 in the control group. The final tube position was evaluated using radiography. The electromagnetic guided group showed better success rates and shorter procedure times when compared to the control group. Additionally, in the electromagnetic guided group, higher pH values were found in the fluids aspirated from the probe, suggesting successful postpyloric placement. CONCLUSION: The electromagnetically guided method provided better placement accuracy than did the conventional technique.
Abstract
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(4):331-337
DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000400003
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients nutritional deficiency is common. Considering this fact, the diary monitoring of energy delivered is extremely important. The objective of this study is to assess the adequacy of enteral nutrition (EN) in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and identify the reasons for interruptions in feeding. METHODS: Prospective study of adult patients admitted to ICU in period of 53 days. Patients receiving continuous enteral tube feeding (22 hours/day) exclusively and post-pyloric tube feeding position were followed. The feeding volume started at 25 mL/h and was increased until nutritional goal, guided by a feeding protocol. RESULTS: 33 patients between 18 and 85 years old were studied. 58% were male. The main admission diagnoses were cardiovascular diseases (27%) and septic shock (21%). The mean time to feeding was 25.3 hours after the patient admission and nutritional goal was achieved in a mean time of 32 hours. The total volume prescribed per day was sufficient to guarantee a mean of 26.1 kcal/kg of body weight and 1.04 g of protein/kg of body weight. Patients received a mean of 19.5 kcal/kg of body weight and 0.8 g of protein/kg of body weight, which correspond a 74% of adequacy. Interruptions of feeding for routine procedures related to patients accounted for 40.6% of the total reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The nutritional support is adequate considering the literature for these patients, who clinical instability causes gastrointestinal intolerance. The effective participation of the Nutrition Therapy Team can contribute positively on nutritional therapy.