Natriuretic peptides Archives - Critical Care Science (CCS)

  • Review Article10-14-2019

    The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(3):368-378

    Abstract

    Review Article

    The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2019;31(3):368-378

    DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20190060

    Views264

    ABSTRACT

    Sepsis continues to be a leading public health burden in the United States and worldwide. With the increasing use of advanced laboratory technology, there is a renewed interest in the use of biomarkers in sepsis to aid in more precise and targeted decision-making. Natriuretic peptides have been increasingly recognized to play a role outside of heart failure. They are commonly elevated among critically ill patients in the setting of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may play a role in identifying patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are limited data on the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, outcomes and prognosis of septic patients. This review seeks to describe the role of natriuretic peptides in fluid resuscitation, diagnosis of ventricular dysfunction and outcomes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) have been noted to be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. BNP/NT-proBNP may predict fluid responsiveness, and trends of these peptides may play a role in fluid resuscitation. Despite suggestions of a correlation with mortality, the role of BNP in mortality outcomes and prognosis during sepsis needs further evaluation.

    See more
    The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
review-article
Section
Artigo Original Destaque
Authors' Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Clinical Information
CLINICAL REPORT
COMENTÁRIOS
COMMENTARIES
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editorial
Erratum
Guidelines and Consensus
III Consenso Brasileiro de Ventilação Mecância
Letter to the Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Clinical Research
Original Article - Neonatology
Original Article - Nursing
Original Article - Pediatrics
Research Letter
Review Article
Review Article - Pediatrics
Série: Medicina baseada em evidências e terapia intensiva
Série: Terminalidade em UTI
Special Article
Terminalidade em UTI pediátrica
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2025; v.37
2024; v.37
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE