Search - Critical Care Science (CCS)

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula in the prevention of intubation and re-intubation in critically ill patients compared to conventional oxygen therapy or noninvasive ventilation.

Methods:

This systematic review was performed through an electronic database search of articles published from 1966 to April 2018. The primary outcome was the need for intubation or re-intubation. The secondary outcomes were therapy escalation, mortality at the longest follow-up, hospital mortality and the need for noninvasive ventilation.

Results:

Seventeen studies involving 3,978 patients were included. There was no reduction in the need for intubation or re-intubation with high-flow nasal cannula (OR 0.72; 95%CI 0.52 – 1.01; p = 0.056). There was no difference in the need for therapy escalation (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59 – 1.08, p = 0.144), mortality at the longest follow-up (OR 0.94; 95%CI 0.70 – 1.25; p = 0.667), hospital mortality (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.56 – 1.26; p = 0.391) or noninvasive ventilation (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.39 – 1.05, p = 0.075). In the trial sequential analysis, the number of events included was lower than the optimal information size with a global type I error > 0.05.

Conclusion:

In the present study and setting, high-flow nasal cannula was not associated with a reduction of the need for intubation or re-intubation in critically ill patients.