Artigo Original Destaque Archives - Critical Care Science (CCS)

  • Artigo Original Destaque

    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17

    Abstract

    Artigo Original Destaque

    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100003

    Views1

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis represents the major cause of death in the ICUs all over the world. Many studies have shown an increasing incidence over time and only a slight reduce in mortality. Many new treatment strategies are arising and we should define the incidence and features of sepsis in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in sixty-five hospitals all over Brazil. The patients who were admitted or who developed sepsis during the month of September, 2003 were enrolled. They were followed until the 28th day and/or until their discharge. The diagnoses were made in accordance to the criteria proposed by ACCP/SCCM. It were evaluated demographic features, APACHE II score, SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score, mortality, sources of infections, microbiology, morbidities and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Seventy-five ICUs from all regions of Brazil took part in the study.3128 patients were identified and 521 (16.7%) filled the criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Mean age was 61.7 (IQR 39-79), 293 (55.7%) were males, and the overall 28-day mortality rate was 46.6%. Average APACHE II score was 20 and SOFA score on the first day was 7 (IQR 4-10). SOFA score in the mortality group was higher on day 1 (8, IQR 5-11), and had increased on day 3 (9, IQR 6-12). The mortality rate for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock was 16.7%, 34.4% and 65.3%, respectively. The average LOS was 15 days (IQR 5-22). The two main sources of infection were the respiratory tract (69%) and the abdomen one (23.1%). Gram-negative bacilli were more prevalent (40.1%). Gram-positive cocci were identified in 32.8% and fungi infections in 5%. Mechanical ventilation was observed in 82.1% of the patients, Swan-Ganz catheter in 18.8%, vasopressors in 66.2% and hemotransfusion in 44.7%. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed a high mortality of sepsis in the ICUs in Brazil. The high frequency of septic shock demonstrated a group at high risk of death. In order to have a better use of the resources and reduce in mortality during the next 5 years, it is very important to identify our specific features related to this syndrome.

    See more
    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
Section
Article
Articles
Artigo de Revisão
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original - Enfermagem
Artigo Original - Neonatologia
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos Originais
Artigos Originais - Pesquisa Báscia
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
CARTA AO EDITOR
CARTAS AO EDITOR
CARTAS AO EDITOR
Case Report
CASE REPORTS
Clinical Report
Comentário
Comentários
COMMENTARIES
COMMENTARY
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondência
Editorial
EDITORIALS
ERRATA
Erratum
III Consenso Brasileiro de Ventilação Mecância
Informação Clínica
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Neonatologia
Original Article - Pediatria
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Original Articles - Basic Research
Original Articles - Clinical Research
Ponto de Vista
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Research Letter
RESPOSTA DOS AUTORES
REVIEW ARTICLE
Review Articles
REVISÃO
Série: Medicina baseada em evidências e terapia intensiva
Série: Terminalidade em UTI
SPECIAL ARTICLE
SPECIAL ARTICLES
Terminalidade em UTI pediátrica
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE