Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Nadim Farid Safatle"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Critical analysis of hospital surgical patients in intensive care unit

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(3):348-353

    Abstract

    Critical analysis of hospital surgical patients in intensive care unit

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(3):348-353

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000300014

    Views2

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Each intensive care units result has to be observed in the context of medical care, as well as the institution witch it belongs. There are many types of prognostic index in intensive care. The APACHE II was introduced by Knaus et al. in 1985, being a widely used system to evaluate the illness severity in intensive care patients. This objective was evaluated the prognostic index (APACHE II) in patients submitted to elective or emergency gastrointestinal surgery admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Medical school intensive care unit. It was collected the following data: age, sex, length of stay, intensive care indication, type of surgery (elective or emergency), body mass index (BMI) APACHE II and predicted mortality. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients data were collected during the period of April 2005 to April 2006. Eighteen patients died and twenty survived. The age of the non-survivors varied from 44 to 92 (mean age 66.6); while the age of the survivors varied from 28 to 78 (mean age 59. 1). The BMI of the non-survivors varied from 22 to 29 (mean body mass index 26) while in the other group the mean body mass index was 25. 6. No significant difference was noted in the age and body mass index of both groups. The length of stay varied from 2 to 52 days in the non-survivors group (mean 11.3 days), while in the survivors group varied from 1 to 30 days (mean 4.9). The APACHE II varied from 5 to 32 in the non-survivors group (mean 19.14). While in the survivors group varied from 1 to 18 (mean 8.6). The length of stay and APACHE II demonstrated a significant difference in both groups, being higher in the non-survivors group. The non-survivors predicted mortality varied from 3.1 to 84.9 (mean 38.8); while the survivors mean was 7.5. The Standardized Mortality Rate in this study was 1.22. CONCLUSIONS: Non-survivors patients APACHE II was higher than the survivors; the SMR was similar to others studies; the length of stay was longer in the non-survivors group; no statistic difference was noted in the body mass index.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
review-article
Section
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles - Basic Research
Original Articles - Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE