parameters Archives - Critical Care Science (CCS)

  • Artigos originais

    Weaning from mechanical ventilation process at hospitals in Federal District

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(1):38-43

    Abstract

    Artigos originais

    Weaning from mechanical ventilation process at hospitals in Federal District

    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2007;19(1):38-43

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2007000100005

    Views0

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concerning the mechanical ventilation, the weaning is a usual and significant intensive care process. Identifying, describing and demonstrating the techniques used by Respiratory Therapists in weaning and also obtaining its parameters in Intensive Care Units (ICU). METHODS: A survey related to the weaning process was done with active ICU Respiratory Therapists from (FD) in the year 2005. The survey consisted of 31 subjective and objective questions, some of them allowing multiple answers. RESULTS: Eighty surveys were carried out at twenty hospitals. 90% of participants were specialized staff with a mean of three year working experience in ICU. In 98.7% of the answers, doctors and respiratory therapists were responsible for operating the ventilators. In 61.3%, doctors and respiratory therapists were responsible for their use and, in 36.3%, the responsibility was solely on the respiratory therapist professionals. It was found that only twenty-four respiratory therapists (30%) follow the weaning protocol. Among the most practiced parameters from the weaning process are: respiratory frequency (98%), tidal volume (97.5%) and periferic oxygen saturation (92.5%). The least utilized are the maximum inspiratory pressure (18.8%) and the vital capacity (13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Great differences were observed in the weaning methods, choice of parameters and the way they were collected. These variations suggest that there is a lack of routine and the need to implement simple protocols.

    See more

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
case-report
correction
editorial
editorial
letter
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
research-article
review-article
review-article
Section
Articles
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos originais
Author's Response
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical Report
Comentários
Commentaries
Commentary
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editoriais
Editorial
Editorials
Erratum
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Original Article
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Neonatologia
Original Articles
Original Articles - Basic Research
Original Articles - Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Research Letter
Review
Review Article
Special Article
Special Articles
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE