Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure - Critical Care Science (CCS)
Home » Articles » Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure
We thank Dr. Esquinas and Reazaul for their interest in our study and their thoughtful commentaries about some aspects of the methodology and the generalizability of the results.
Yuste ME, Moreno O, Narbona S, Acosta F, Peñas L, Colmenero M. Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2020;32(2):330-1.
Electronic Document Format (ABNT)
Yuste, Maria Eugenia; Moreno, Olga; Narbona, Susana; Acosta, Fernando; Peñas, Luis; Colmenero, Manuel. Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, v. 32, n. 2, p. 330-331, Jul. 2020.
Electronic Document Format (APA)
Yuste, M. E., Moreno, O., Narbona, S., Acosta, F., Peñas, L., & Colmenero, M. (2020). Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 32(2), 330-331.
Electronic Document Format (ISO)
Yuste, Maria Eugenia and Moreno, Olga and Narbona, Susana and Acosta, Fernando and Peñas, Luis and Colmenero, Manuel. Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva [online]. 2020, vol. 32, n. 2, [cited 2024-05-09], pp.330-331. Available from: <https://criticalcarescience.org/article/reply-to-efficacy-and-safety-of-high-flow-nasal-cannula-oxygen-therapy-in-moderate-acute-hypercapnic-respiratory-failure/>.
✕
Reply to: Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in moderate acute hypercapnic respiratory failure |
To the Editor
We thank Dr. Esquinas and Reazaul for their interest in our study and their thoughtful commentaries about some aspects of the methodology and the generalizability of the results.
Comments