Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)
You searched for:"Fernando Augusto Bozza"
We found (15) results for your search.
, , , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250237
04-02-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250237
, , , , , To evaluate risk factors, molecular profiles, and hospital mortality of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in intensive care unit patients.
In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, intensive care unit admissions from 52 intensive care units between January 2019 and December 2020 were analyzed in a nested case-control design. Patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections were propensity score-matched 1:1 to those with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales infections. Hierarchical conditional logistic regression identified risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and multivariable logistic regression assessed the association of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with 60-day in-hospital mortality. Molecular genotyping was also conducted.
Matching resulted in 250 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales patients and 250 carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales patients. Sepsis was more common in the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales group (58% versus 35%; p < 0.001). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales included major premorbid assistance requirements (OR 1.72, 95%CI 0.99 - 3.01; p = 0.06) and intensive care unit readmission (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.00 - 3.49; p = 0.05), although with weak associations. Acute COVID-19 (OR 3.55, 95%CI 1.96 - 6.45; p < 0.001) also increased the odds of resistance. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection was associated with twice the likelihood of 60-day mortality after adjusting for covariates (OR 1.95, 95%CI 1.26 - 3.02; p < 0.001). The predominant bacteria and carbapenemase resistance genes included Klebsiella pneumoniae (79%), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (73%), New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (13%), and xacillinase-48 (9%).
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales-related infections in intensive care unit patients were associated with major premorbid dependence, intensive care unit readmission, and acute COVID-19. In addition, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections were independently associated with poorer hospital outcomes. This study also characterized the resistance profile of Enterobacterales in Brazilian intensive care units, which are dominated by K. pneumoniae with high rates of carbapenemase and increased rates of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase, in comparison with previous reports.
Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250237
04-02-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250237
, , , , , To evaluate risk factors, molecular profiles, and hospital mortality of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in intensive care unit patients.
In this retrospective, multicenter cohort study, intensive care unit admissions from 52 intensive care units between January 2019 and December 2020 were analyzed in a nested case-control design. Patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections were propensity score-matched 1:1 to those with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales infections. Hierarchical conditional logistic regression identified risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, and multivariable logistic regression assessed the association of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with 60-day in-hospital mortality. Molecular genotyping was also conducted.
Matching resulted in 250 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales patients and 250 carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales patients. Sepsis was more common in the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales group (58% versus 35%; p < 0.001). Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales included major premorbid assistance requirements (OR 1.72, 95%CI 0.99 - 3.01; p = 0.06) and intensive care unit readmission (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.00 - 3.49; p = 0.05), although with weak associations. Acute COVID-19 (OR 3.55, 95%CI 1.96 - 6.45; p < 0.001) also increased the odds of resistance. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection was associated with twice the likelihood of 60-day mortality after adjusting for covariates (OR 1.95, 95%CI 1.26 - 3.02; p < 0.001). The predominant bacteria and carbapenemase resistance genes included Klebsiella pneumoniae (79%), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (73%), New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (13%), and xacillinase-48 (9%).
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales-related infections in intensive care unit patients were associated with major premorbid dependence, intensive care unit readmission, and acute COVID-19. In addition, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections were independently associated with poorer hospital outcomes. This study also characterized the resistance profile of Enterobacterales in Brazilian intensive care units, which are dominated by K. pneumoniae with high rates of carbapenemase and increased rates of New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase, in comparison with previous reports.
Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250204
02-28-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250204
Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250204
02-28-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250204
, , , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250076
01-15-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250076
, , , , , , , , To define the incidence of ventriculostomy-associated infections and their impact on the mortality and functional outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
We prospectively included all consecutive adult aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients admitted to the neurological intensive care units of the Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Hospital Cristo Redentor (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) who required external ventricular drains from July 2015 to December 2020. Daily clinical and laboratory variables were collected at admission and during the hospital stay. The presence of ventriculostomy-associated infections was evaluated daily, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria. Hospital and 12-month outcomes were compared between patients with and without ventriculostomy-associated infections via both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Out of the 676 patients screened, 271 received external ventricular drains (40%) and were included in the study. The mean age was 54 years (IQR 46–63), 198 were female (72%), 47% had poor grade status (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale 4 and 5), and 75% had modified Fisher 3 or 4. The mean time from admission to external ventricular drain placement was 8.8 days. Ventriculostomy-associated infections developed in 127 patients (47%), and the mean time from external ventricular drain to ventriculostomy-associated infection diagnosis was 4.4 days. Hospital and 12-month mortality rates did not differ between the ventriculostomy-associated infection group and the nonventriculostomy-associated infection group (36% versus 40% and 43% versus 49%, respectively). Poor functional outcomes, defined as modified Rankin scores of 4 to 6, showed no difference between groups at hospital discharge (ventriculostomy-associated infections 75% versus nonventriculostomy-associated infections 73%; p = NS) or at 12 months (ventriculostomy-associated infections 49% versus nonventriculostomy-associated infections 53%; p = NS).
Ventriculostomy-associated infections are common complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although it was not associated with hospital mortality or functional outcomes in our cohort, improving diagnostic accuracy and preventive measures is essential for better understanding the long-term impact of one of the most severe infectious complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2025;37:e20250076
01-15-2025
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20250076
, , , , , , , , To define the incidence of ventriculostomy-associated infections and their impact on the mortality and functional outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
We prospectively included all consecutive adult aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients admitted to the neurological intensive care units of the Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Hospital Cristo Redentor (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) who required external ventricular drains from July 2015 to December 2020. Daily clinical and laboratory variables were collected at admission and during the hospital stay. The presence of ventriculostomy-associated infections was evaluated daily, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria. Hospital and 12-month outcomes were compared between patients with and without ventriculostomy-associated infections via both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Out of the 676 patients screened, 271 received external ventricular drains (40%) and were included in the study. The mean age was 54 years (IQR 46–63), 198 were female (72%), 47% had poor grade status (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale 4 and 5), and 75% had modified Fisher 3 or 4. The mean time from admission to external ventricular drain placement was 8.8 days. Ventriculostomy-associated infections developed in 127 patients (47%), and the mean time from external ventricular drain to ventriculostomy-associated infection diagnosis was 4.4 days. Hospital and 12-month mortality rates did not differ between the ventriculostomy-associated infection group and the nonventriculostomy-associated infection group (36% versus 40% and 43% versus 49%, respectively). Poor functional outcomes, defined as modified Rankin scores of 4 to 6, showed no difference between groups at hospital discharge (ventriculostomy-associated infections 75% versus nonventriculostomy-associated infections 73%; p = NS) or at 12 months (ventriculostomy-associated infections 49% versus nonventriculostomy-associated infections 53%; p = NS).
Ventriculostomy-associated infections are common complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although it was not associated with hospital mortality or functional outcomes in our cohort, improving diagnostic accuracy and preventive measures is essential for better understanding the long-term impact of one of the most severe infectious complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
, , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240118en
07-03-2024
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20240118-en
, , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2024;36:e20240118en
07-03-2024
DOI 10.62675/2965-2774.20240118-en
, , , , 
, , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2023;35(2):236-238
08-07-2023
DOI 10.5935/2965-2774.20230428-en
, , , , Abstract
Critical Care Science. 2023;35(2):236-238
08-07-2023
DOI 10.5935/2965-2774.20230428-en
, , , , 
, , Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2021;33(2):183-187
07-05-2021
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20210025
, , Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2021;33(2):183-187
07-05-2021
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20210025
, , 
, , Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2021;33(1):1-11
04-19-2021
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20210001
, , , , , , , To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management.
A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, answered questions related to the following topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamics, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and checklists use. The outcomes considered were cardiac arrests, number of organs removed or transplanted as well as function / survival of transplanted organs. The quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to classify the recommendations.
A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong, 11 as weak and 1 was considered a good clinical practice.
Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak.
Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2021;33(1):1-11
04-19-2021
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20210001
, , , , , , , To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management.
A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, answered questions related to the following topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamics, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and checklists use. The outcomes considered were cardiac arrests, number of organs removed or transplanted as well as function / survival of transplanted organs. The quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to classify the recommendations.
A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong, 11 as weak and 1 was considered a good clinical practice.
Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak.
, Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2020;32(2):224-228
06-24-2020
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20200030
, , , , To estimate the reporting rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases for Brazil as a whole and states.
We estimated the actual number of COVID-19 cases using the reported number of deaths in Brazil and each state, and the expected case-fatality ratio from the World Health Organization. Brazil’s expected case-fatality ratio was also adjusted by the population’s age pyramid. Therefore, the notification rate can be defined as the number of confirmed cases (notified by the Ministry of Health) divided by the number of expected cases (estimated from the number of deaths).
The reporting rate for COVID-19 in Brazil was estimated at 9.2% (95%CI 8.8% - 9.5%), with all the states presenting rates below 30%. São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the most populated states in Brazil, showed small reporting rates (8.9% and 7.2%, respectively). The highest reporting rate occurred in Roraima (31.7%) and the lowest in Paraiba (3.4%).
The results indicated that the reporting of confirmed cases in Brazil is much lower as compared to other countries we analyzed. Therefore, decision-makers, including the government, fail to know the actual dimension of the pandemic, which may interfere with the determination of control measures.
Abstract
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2020;32(2):224-228
06-24-2020
DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20200030
, , , , To estimate the reporting rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases for Brazil as a whole and states.
We estimated the actual number of COVID-19 cases using the reported number of deaths in Brazil and each state, and the expected case-fatality ratio from the World Health Organization. Brazil’s expected case-fatality ratio was also adjusted by the population’s age pyramid. Therefore, the notification rate can be defined as the number of confirmed cases (notified by the Ministry of Health) divided by the number of expected cases (estimated from the number of deaths).
The reporting rate for COVID-19 in Brazil was estimated at 9.2% (95%CI 8.8% - 9.5%), with all the states presenting rates below 30%. São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the most populated states in Brazil, showed small reporting rates (8.9% and 7.2%, respectively). The highest reporting rate occurred in Roraima (31.7%) and the lowest in Paraiba (3.4%).
The results indicated that the reporting of confirmed cases in Brazil is much lower as compared to other countries we analyzed. Therefore, decision-makers, including the government, fail to know the actual dimension of the pandemic, which may interfere with the determination of control measures.
