Você pesquisou por y - Critical Care Science (CCS)

You searched for:"Cleovaldo T. S. Pinheiro"

We found (1) results for your search.
  • Artigo Original Destaque

    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17

    Abstract

    Artigo Original Destaque

    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

    Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2006;18(1):9-17

    DOI 10.1590/S0103-507X2006000100003

    Views47

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sepsis represents the major cause of death in the ICUs all over the world. Many studies have shown an increasing incidence over time and only a slight reduce in mortality. Many new treatment strategies are arising and we should define the incidence and features of sepsis in Brazil. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in sixty-five hospitals all over Brazil. The patients who were admitted or who developed sepsis during the month of September, 2003 were enrolled. They were followed until the 28th day and/or until their discharge. The diagnoses were made in accordance to the criteria proposed by ACCP/SCCM. It were evaluated demographic features, APACHE II score, SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score, mortality, sources of infections, microbiology, morbidities and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Seventy-five ICUs from all regions of Brazil took part in the study.3128 patients were identified and 521 (16.7%) filled the criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Mean age was 61.7 (IQR 39-79), 293 (55.7%) were males, and the overall 28-day mortality rate was 46.6%. Average APACHE II score was 20 and SOFA score on the first day was 7 (IQR 4-10). SOFA score in the mortality group was higher on day 1 (8, IQR 5-11), and had increased on day 3 (9, IQR 6-12). The mortality rate for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock was 16.7%, 34.4% and 65.3%, respectively. The average LOS was 15 days (IQR 5-22). The two main sources of infection were the respiratory tract (69%) and the abdomen one (23.1%). Gram-negative bacilli were more prevalent (40.1%). Gram-positive cocci were identified in 32.8% and fungi infections in 5%. Mechanical ventilation was observed in 82.1% of the patients, Swan-Ganz catheter in 18.8%, vasopressors in 66.2% and hemotransfusion in 44.7%. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed a high mortality of sepsis in the ICUs in Brazil. The high frequency of septic shock demonstrated a group at high risk of death. In order to have a better use of the resources and reduce in mortality during the next 5 years, it is very important to identify our specific features related to this syndrome.

    See more
    An epidemiological study of sepsis in Intensive Care Units: Sepsis Brazil study

Search

Search in:

Article type
article-commentary
brief-report
case-report
correction
editorial
letter
other
rapid-communication
reply
research-article
review-article
Section
Article
Articles
Artigo de Revisão
Artigo de Revisão - Pediatria
Artigo de Revisão de Pediatria
Artigo Original
Artigo Original - Enfermagem
Artigo Original - Neonatologia
Artigo Original de Pediatria
Artigo Original Destaque
Artigos de Revisão
Artigos Originais
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Carta ao Editor
CARTAS AO EDITOR
Case Report
Case Report
Case Reports
CLINICAL REPORT
Comentário
Comentários
COMMENTARIES
COMMENTARY
Consenso Brasileiro de Monitorização e Suporte Hemodinâmico
Correspondence
Editorial
EDITORIALS
Erratum
Erratum
Guidelines and Consensus
III Consenso Brasileiro de Ventilação Mecância
Informação Clínica
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Original Article - Basic Research
Original Article - Neonatologia
Original Article - Pediatria
Original Articles
Original Articles - Basic Research
Original Articles - Clinical Research
Relato de Caso
Relatos de Caso
Relatos de Casos
Research Letter
REVIEW
Review Article
Review Articles
Série: Medicina baseada em evidências e terapia intensiva
Série: Terminalidade em UTI
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Special Article
Special Articles
Terminalidade em UTI pediátrica
Viewpoint
Year / Volume
2025; v.37
2024; v.36
2023; v.35
2022; v.34
2021; v.33
2020; v.32
2019; v.31
2018; v.30
2017; v.29
2016; v.28
2015; v.27
2014; v.26
2013; v.25
2012; v.24
2011; v.23
2010; v.22
2009; v.21
2008; v.20
2007; v.19
2006; v.18
ISSUE